Political Memes

5506 readers

1969 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1267

Choices and Consequences (mander.xyz)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/politicalmemes

197 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AA5B 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Getting off coal would be the thing. I don’t know if they would have been able to advance batteries quickly enough regardless of investment, but getting off coal was quite doable. Nuclear fission was still in ascendancy and could have continued ever upward. Wind power was quite practical, even if not at the scale and cost of today. Solar water heating, weatherproofing, and passive solar design could have brought energy needs way down. In that era we had just gone through a radical downsizing of cars from an energy crisis, and we could have required that continue. We had made progress on many pollutants and started recycling: its not difficult to imagine carbon being recognized as a pollutant and efforts started to control it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just one thing, wind without batteries or some kind of balancing can actually be quite bad because you have to quickly turn on and off other power sources, which means they're inefficient. My dad says (way back then) they actually found wind increased carbon production because they had to quickly turn on inefficient generators when the wind died down.

[–] AA5B 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Maybe. My parents at that time were on time of use metering, but it was fixed time. For example the water heater was on a timer to turn on at 11pm when electric rates went down.

could they have figured out a networking technology for more dynamic time of use metering and response? Networking existed, as did integrated circuits
my parents also had thermal storage electric heat. That alone could have made a huge difference in balancing demand with supply

Put those two together and you could have dynamic demand response even without grid scale batteries