this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
119 points (81.5% liked)

science

14678 readers
178 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
m3t00
Joleee
laverabe
[email protected]
119
It’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for life (www.nature.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by kalkulat to c/science
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Review of 2023 book: How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology Philip Ball. ISBN9781529095999

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Donjuanme -1 points 9 months ago

There are way more than half a dozen, they're just too dry to get the algorithm's/communities attention. Most Internet viewers want an answer in x minutes or less, they don't care to understand what the details of the questions are. If an answer is able to be given in a few minutes, why would the question exist for centuries?