this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
713 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4396 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Well, if I were him I’d want to debate me too. He’s got nothing else to do.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pavidus 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I'm torn. On one hand, debates should take place to show knowledge/professionalism/action plans, etc. Also, it showcases (yet again) what a fucking idiot he is. On the other hand, he hasn't done a debate so far for this presidential race, so why start now? It's been nice hearing about him slightly less.

Also....how the fuck are debates not somehow mandatory to end up in the presidential race?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

debates haven't been legit for decades and since then they progressively get worse

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They aren't even debates. Just people yelling over each other for sound bytes and some TV time.

[–] PilferJynx 4 points 9 months ago

"Will you shut up, man!" Remember how their last debate played out. It'll be worse this time around.

[–] Pavidus 2 points 9 months ago
[–] themeatbridge 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Neither has officially won their party's respective nominations. There is plenty of time, and there will be debates.

[–] Pavidus 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The primaries are what I was referring to. I understand there's time for actual candidate debates.

[–] themeatbridge 2 points 9 months ago

Oh then yeah, I agree with you, Trump and Haley should debate. I'm not sure anything is gained having Biden debate any challengers.

[–] ook_the_librarian 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand, he hasn't done a debate so far for this presidential race

It is way too early for R vs. D debates. Why would Biden debate him? Biden is handily beating Dean Phillips. Trump needs to defeat Haley first. It's not Biden fault Haley is still in it.

[–] Pavidus 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is too early indeed. I was referring to all of the primary debates he skipped.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

At this point, the only ones debating/wanting to debate are the losers.