this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
361 points (96.9% liked)

News

23412 readers
3530 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ms Carroll, 80, told ABC News on Monday: "I'd like to give the money to something Donald Trump hates.

"If it will cause him pain for me to give money to certain things, that's my intent."

The former magazine columnist suggested the money could be used to set up a "fund for the women who have been sexually assaulted by Donald Trump".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cris_Color 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The former magazine columnist [Jean Carrol] suggested the money could be used to set up a "fund for the women who have been sexually assaulted by Donald Trump".

Yes, its harmful because she feels Donald trump would hate that she's supporting the women he's sexually assaulted or harrassed. He repeatedly defamed her by insisting he didn't sexually assault her, and so as "revenge" she's going to support his other victims with the money that used to be his... Wow, what a waste. Fuck those rape victims, amirite?

There is such a thing as more than one worthwhile cause. If you wanna argue about the fact she suggested that as one possible use for the money you can, but earnestly taking issue with the idea of using the money to support his other victims because it's not going towards the issues you're personally most invested in is insane.

Supporting rape victims as revenge against someone who has repeatedly been accused of, and now found guilty of sexual misconduct, is a perfectly just cause.

[–] maness300 -1 points 10 months ago

It's not insane to support saving lives over getting revenge.

These people are clearly biased.