this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
214 points (99.1% liked)

Linux

48655 readers
1428 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As pointed out in This Week in GNOME, there's been some continued work on Variable Rate Refresh for the GNOME desktop. The VRR setting within GNOME Settings continues to be iterated on as the developers iron out how they'd like to present the Variable Rate Refresh setting for users. The developers have been discussing how to best present the option as to avoid confusion as well as how it makes the most technical sense as far as the option goes.

Edit: "Variable Refresh Rate - Roadmap" - https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/3125

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I find GNOME's "must be perfect" approach to accepting new code counterintuitive.

One of the largest benefits of having a clean architecture is increased velocity and extensibility. What's the point in nitpicking over perfection when it takes literally years to merge a feature, arguably one considered basic and essential by today's standards?

KDE is on the other side of this pendulum, integrating everything and resulting in a disjointed, buggy disaster.

Where's the middle way? It used to be XFCE. What is it now?

[–] TheGrandNagus 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I definitely get what you mean, and sometimes agree, but tbh I'm glad Gnome is an option for those who want a DE that is uncompromisingly UX-focused and straight up won't accept changes until they're damn sure it'll be production-ready.

And while they've been relatively slow in getting adaptive refresh working, they've been very quick with some other things. Idk why it took them this long to sort out the cursor occasionally becoming out of sync with displayed content's refresh rate, but there must be a reason for it.

Gnome was at the forefront with Wayland, PulseAudio, they've been the biggest pusher of Portals, pretty much all of their GTK4 apps have been designed to also be compatible with mobile devices. Accessibility features on Gnome are also pretty great for a Linux DE.

As a general rule, I'd say their development process works well, despite there being the occasional holdup.

And while Plasma obviously isn't nearly as bug-free as Gnome, it's come a long way since the Plasma 4/early Plasma 5 days. I still don't feel I can depend on it the same as I could for Gnome or Cinnamon (compositor crashes bringing down all open apps is a big issue in particular - and is finally due to be fixed in Plasma 6), but don't underestimate their progress — since like 5.15/5.16 they've improved leaps and bounds.

And with 6 it looks like they've learned from the mistakes of 4 and 5's launches.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Quality control is important for a project that is going to be supported for long time, and used by many. Slow but steady is a right approach for open source project, IMO.

[–] maness300 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)