Technology

59710 readers

5603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

430

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s to c/technology

396 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Nope humans don't store data perfectly with perfect recall.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Neither do neural networks.

[–] abhibeckert 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Humans can get pretty close to perfect recall with enough practice - show a human that exact joker image hundreds of thousands of times, they're going to be able to remember every detail.

That's what happened here - the example images weren't just in the training set once, they are in the training set over and over and over again across hundreds of thousands of websites.

If someone wants these images nobody is going to use AI to access it - they'll just do a google image search. There is no way Warner Brothers is harmed in any way by this, which is a strong fair use defence.

[–] Jilanico 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Some do. Should we jail all the talented artists with photographic memories?

[–] topinambour_rex 3 points 10 months ago

If they exactly reproduce others work, and gain a profit for it, a fine would be the minimum.

[–] dragontamer 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If they're copying copyrighted works, usually its a fine, especially if they're making money from it.

You know that performance artists get sued when they replicate a song in public from memory, right?

[–] Jilanico 1 points 10 months ago

I don't think anyone is advocating to legalize the sale of copyrighted material made via AI.