this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
1384 points (94.9% liked)

Gaming

3249 readers
161 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hdnsmbt 47 points 11 months ago (5 children)

You realize it's not devs that make those decisions, right? It's publishers and execs. You know, the guys who make the actual money in all this. Stop blaming devs for stupid exec decisions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

So glad to see op being called out in the comments

[–] Strider 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, you're right. However if no dev stands for that it couldn't get made.

Of course I also understand that devs want to eat, too. But the truth is somewhere in between.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Meh, it depends on which of the issues you're flagging. Games are large for understandable reasons, both technical and practical. The optimization problem is... complicated, and my thoughts on it get really into the weeds, but it's not as simple as people would think. And I'm trying not to pay too much attention to the "can't fix our game" panel, because at best it makes no sense.

The always-online thing is maybe the most controversial, and you'd definitely find the most developers who agree with you on that unconditionally. But also, tons of offline games get made on all types of scopes.

[–] olutukko 3 points 11 months ago

Yeav plus games today are way more complicated so there is a LOT more to optimize, and the execs are rushing those games out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Exec: breast milk for everyone!

Also, devs stick around for it. They aren't providing an essential service, like sticking around as a nurse in a poorly run hospital...they are creating a novelty.

[–] TheKracken 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And where should they go? How else do they make money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Huh? We live in a society! Do anything you want!

They are technical knowledge workers and hold very privileged credentials in western markets.

To be clear I'm not excusing corporate policy and such, but the same way technical engineers at oil companies are complicit in accelerated climate change, devs at shitty companies are complicit in shitty game products.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Getting downvoted by salty tech folks working for nestle and shell I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yup. Or coddled game devs who think they are gods gift to society.

Game dev is real work, but it's entirely optional.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I never worked for big bad companies but even the "green, progressive" ones wore me down eventually, there just aren't any companies in the modern world over a certain size that aren't scummy one way or another. That's why I only work for myself now.

I almost worked in NGO but it didn't work out in the end, I could still be curious to check that out at some point.

[–] MindSkipperBro12 -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Guess the Devs are just following orders, huh?

[–] hdnsmbt 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, totally, they're no better than Nazis, top fucking comparison, buddy.

[–] MindSkipperBro12 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s an extreme example but the principle remains the same: The idea of someone’s responsibility when following questionable orders.

[–] hdnsmbt 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, it's a fucking stupid comparison, man. One thing leads to dead people, the other thing leads to slightly less convenient entertainment software. Can you figure out the rest for yourself? Fuck all the way off with your "questionable orders".

[–] MindSkipperBro12 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What’s with the hostility? Did your Wife cheat on you again?

[–] hdnsmbt 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I expressed how your comparison is stupid. I'm sorry if you perceive that as hostile and think you need to get a point in by making up an equally stupid scenario about my marriage. Obviously I hit a nerve. Can't say the same about your shitty attempt at an insult.