Technology

59713 readers

5858 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

433

The Absurdity of the Return-to-Office Movement (www.cnn.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s to c/technology

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Absurdity of the Return-to-Office Movement::The return-to-office demands make little sense from an overall economic perspective, while working parents, in particular, benefit from not having to waste time commuting to an office, writes Peter Bergen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The value of commercial buildings doesn't go to zero. They're just cut in half (based on recent sales prices).

Just because the price of an asset goes down doesn't mean the economy crumbles. In fact, buyers / renters are now better off. I'm sure poor Grandmas are in that category.

[+] [email protected] -6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Pensions are paid off based on the booked value. If the asset you own is worth half of what you paid for it that is a problem. If you bought a house for 1 million and you need to sell it to pay for something else and can only get 500k are you prepared for eating that loss?

Of course I can guess your answer because you probably feel you know better than the vast majority of governments and economists but that's a moot point by now.

I'm not claiming to know the answer because I understand it's complex enough to not.

What I am confident in is that despite what you or I say is but a drop in how serious the issue is. The difference is I'm not wasting energy screaming into the wind.

[–] stoly 4 points 10 months ago

You really are invested in this topic, it's odd.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

No pension fund owns only commercial real estate. If anything, it's like 5% of their entire portfolio. Still, it's not necessarily a problem.

So in your simplified scenario, you have a pension paying retirees that owns 100% of a building. Say few businesses want to lease space in the building, and the value goes down.

They don't have to sell the building. They can just refurbish it and put the retirees in it. That's actually more tax efficient than paying the retirees who then pay their retirement home.

[–] hark 2 points 10 months ago

If governments and economists got us into this mess, then yeah, I guess we do know better than them.