this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
774 points (98.5% liked)

News

23414 readers
4010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“I’m just ashamed that this bill even came into fruition,” a Lexington council member said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Licenses to Kill for everyone! Seriously though, can you really make murder legal, and not face any federal consequences?

[–] cosmicrookie 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They make murder legal but abortion illigal because it is murder

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Once this law passes, I think you're in the clear as long as you get the abortion on your own property and claim self defense.

[–] Fedizen 2 points 10 months ago

you just need to show they didnt pay rent for a month.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kind of like how in the south everything is “Coke,” but there’s different flavors like “Sprite Coke” and “Orange Coke?” (I’m not from the south so I may have gotten that wrong)

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Not quite. Coke is the general term, but nobody would refer to it as “sprite coke”. So the conversation would be more along the lines of:

”Hey, do you want a coke?”
“Sure, what do you have?”
“I’ve got Sprite, Dr Pepper, cola, Pepsi, and root beer.”
“Oh I’ll take a Dr Pepper.”

The first line uses “coke” as a general “soda/pop/etc” term, but notice that it isn’t used again, because they’re not referring to generalized soda/pop/coke anymore, and are being specific. And if you want a Coca-Cola brand Coke, you just ask for cola.

[–] grue 5 points 10 months ago

Nah, we'd use "Coke" again in the third line and it'd be understood to mean specifically Coca-Cola because Pepsi was also mentioned to contrast with it. Otherwise, if we said “I’ve got Sprite, Dr Pepper, coke, and root beer" then that "coke" might be Pepsi. Either way, saying "cola" instead would be unusual.

"Coke" can mean any soda, any cola, or Coca-Cola Classic specifically depending on context.

[–] some_designer_dude 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don’t even see how this changes anything. The cops kill people all day every day and never see consequences besides paid vacations. The legal system is a (dark) joke on everyone but the rich.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The more sinister aspects of the law are sections 18 and 19 which enable them to corral homeless people into basically concentration camps.

[–] Maggoty 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, that's just a road to the worst section. If you can get them to resist, probably by destroying their property, then you've got them on a "violent felony".

Do that three times and this law turns then into a ~~slave~~ prisoner for life, without parole.

Yup, they're pairing this with a three strikes law.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And section 17 of the bill defines camping as setting up camping equipment anywhere outside of designated areas for any reason.

SECTION 17. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 511 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

(1) For purposes of this section:

(a) "Camp" means to pitch, erect, or occupy camp facilities, or to use camp paraphernalia;

(b) "Camp facilities" means structures for the use of camping, including but not limited to tents, huts, temporary shelters, and vehicles; and

( c ) "Camp paraphernalia" means items used for camping purposes, including but not limited to cots, beds, sleeping bags, and hammocks.

(2) A person is guilty of unlawful camping when he or she knowingly enters or remains on a public or private street, sidewalk, area under a bridge or underpass, path, park, or other area designated for use by pedestrians or vehicles, including areas used for ingress or egress to businesses, homes, or public buildings, with the intent to sleep or camp in that area, when the area has not been designated for the purpose of sleeping or camping or the individual lacks authorization to sleep or camp in the area.

(3) Unlawful camping is a:

(a) Violation for the first offense; and

(b) Class B misdemeanor for the second and each subsequent offense, or if during the first offense the individual refuses to cease the offense.

(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the customary and temporary use of recreational camping areas, rest areas, or other properties that are specifically designated for purposes of resting or sleeping

So anyone could just set up a tent somewhere and be jailed or shot. Prop for a photo or movie? Shot. Shade tent in a park at your family's 4th of July barbecue? Shot. Protesters setting up tents just to piss off the cops? Believe it or not, shot.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 10 months ago

Well no, they do except "legitimate recreational activities" later on. The thing is, no one thinking about using this law is going to bother to read the definition.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 10 months ago

In the US the federal government can only prosecute you under specific circumstances. Generally it's going to be the state, or even your county.

[–] rsuri 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Typically states are allowed to set their own criminal laws as it's considered within their powers under the 10th Amendment without federal interference. But they can't pass a law that would violate the US constitution. This one I'm sure would lead to at least a couple of constitutional arguments, one being that if the state used execution to punish illegal camping it would definitely violate the 8th Amendment, and they can't just get around that by outsourcing enforcement to individuals. Even this very Republican supreme court might now allow that.

But to answer the question, if the state wanted to just straight up legalize murder for everyone I think they'd be able to do it without issue.

[–] Maggoty 5 points 10 months ago

Oh they've had stand your ground laws for a while now. This is just a new way to get most Americans to tune out. Police say they were homeless and aggressive.