this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
311 points (93.6% liked)
World News
32592 readers
1019 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, capitalism is what caused all the world wars, even the little battles those guys with the swords did back in 900BC.
You can't just shift the blame for everything in the world on that one thing you hate, just doesn't work like that
Capitalism literally caused both world wars.
Humans caused capitalism.
Sure, but a lot of other humans didn't. Can't much write off an entire species because we failed to prevent an outlier from gaining power for a little while.
Also can't much attribute all the complexities of both wars to just "capitalism" either. That was my point.
Yes you can? Capitalism was very much at the root of the conflict. It can accurately be reduced to capitalism. You can elaborate and provide further detail to how it happened, but that doesn't change the big picture.
Of course you can over-simplify everything. You can do whatever you want!
There is a difference between simplifying and oversimplifying. Just like there is a difference between nuance and losing the forest for the trees.
Wasn't it a couple lads with hurt feelings?
The larger causes were interimperial squabbling which is inevitable when capitalism reaches the stage of competing for foreign markets.
Look at it this way: industrialized warfare required capitalism.
Those guys with the swords in 900bc were fighting over the ability to hoard and exploit available resources and value. That’s capitalism.
So what do you call whenever it’s two communist regimes that are fighting over resources
Good propaganda.