this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
61 points (78.0% liked)

Lemmy

2172 readers
27 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
61
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The existence of lemmy.world which you're part of, proves that lemmy tolerates right-wing instances if you ask me.

Make use of the decentralized nature of lemmy, the devs won't knock at your door for creating or posting on right-wing instances.

[–] gingersneak 41 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Maybe it's more that the majority of the fediverse doesn't tolerate far right bullshit and open racism, unlike the other reddit alternatives.

[–] AchtungDrempels 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy.world is a right wing instance? Is that what you are saying?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I guess the closing footnote of the blog post summarizes it well:

from the point of view of many leftists, they're not very far left, and liberals are, in fact, right wing

Trying to place people as left/right in an international forum like this is a complete waste of time. I'm writing from a Polish instance, where communist symbols are banned and the political left/right dimension looks completely different from my Scandinavian home country. In my traditionally left-leaning home country I'm a leftist. By the minds of many Americans I'm a stupid centrist because I'm not ideologically pure enough - Social Democracy is just capitalism with a human face etc. And don't get me started on the Russians and the Chinese.

For some people, if you reject Leninism you're right wing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For some people, if you reject Leninism you’re right wing.

It goes deeper: sometimes being Leninist is not enough.

I used to be part of a socialist party, split into many "tendencies" (sub-parties? Dunno how to translate it). The way that we often referred to the largest tendency? "The right-wing of the party".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only the purest are good enough for the People's Front of Judea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

In a few cases it is a matter of purity = orthodoxy, indeed. In some it's simply stupidity: failure to realise that those things rely on a point of reference. And in some it was simply "it's understood in the context anyway, so... meh".

Still kind of amusing for outsiders.