politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
So you're working hard on getting better voting systems in place? Supporting progressive candidates and trying to change all the unfair systems that currently make it impossible for them to get a fair shake? Trying to eliminate the establishment Democrats and replacing them with people who will make things better for the working class, so people won't be driven into the arms of even worse Republican candidates?
Because if you were just sitting back waiting for things to magically become better, and promising to vote for a better candidate in the unlikely event that the current system produces one, that would be terribly irresponsible. And very unlikely to succeed.
(I'm not saying you're not doing those things. I don't know. I also know I'm not doing them either; I'm becoming more and more guilty about my lack of any real action in the face of the truly horrifying things that might be coming to us this year and next if the election goes the wrong way.)
So, I believe you reply is something of a divergence from what we were talking about, but I thought I would respond to it anyways, even though it is derailing from the subject at hand (being forced/guilt-tripped into voting a certain way against our own free will).
Yes, actually. I run the Congress app on my phone, I know the name of my senators and my representative, and I watch how they vote.
I try to be an educated voter by watching videos/shows that aren't exactly fluff entertainment (daily PBS news, Sunday morning news shows, all debates, etc.).
When it comes time to vote I actually research people running for smaller offices like judges, etc.
I take my responsibility as a citizen seriously.
I try to support good candidates, not candidates from any one particular party.
Yes, I do so by supporting and voting for politicians that fight for those changes (like Bernie, etc.).
Well, I'm too old to run for office myself, I'm retired.
But I do make comments on public internet forms, trying to sway people's opinion in the direction towards more positive change, and deal with people who wish to respond back to that in a negative way. Those responses can wear you down after a while.
I've also been to a protest before.
Also now that I'm retired I'm considering doing some volunteer work for candidates that I may think are deserving of my time.
They're small things, but I actually take the time to do them,
Yeah, makes a lot of sense.
FWIW, the divergence I guess stemmed from me saying: Yes, absolutely the bulk of the Democratic party is corrupt. I don't see much of a way it would ever get better other than to try to improve the existing Democratic party. I don't see it so much as, the establishment Democrats holding the voters hostage (although in a sense they are), as much as: As bad as the situation is, helping the Republicans is also going to make things worse, so spending the effort putting real pressure on the Democrats to do better seems more productive than just waiting until election day and then not voting for them.
And yeah, I agree with a lot of your sentiments about wanting to help. Like I say, aside from voting and talking on the internet, I haven't been doing squat. I'm starting to feel pretty bad about that and that I should be doing something.
No the divergence was that your whole previous comment didn't mention the subject of Biden running a second time when the Democratic party clearly doesn't want to vote for him a second time, and how that will affect the vote outcome, and who would be responsible for a loss to Trump.
Instead you replied challenging me/people in general about how active we are in the voting process and what we do to improve the system, our responsibilities.
Well, it truly is the Democratic Party's responsibility to put up someone that people would want to vote for, so if they don't vote, its not the voters fault, its the party's fault.
Overall, I used to think the same way you do, but the problem is that that technique of pressuring via guilt gets reused over and over and over again over the years as a control mechanism. So at some point you just have to push back against it, no matter what the cost, or else you'll never be able to choose your own votes. You can only take so many "hits for the team" before you have to do something about it.
Well for a start be sure to use the Congress app (or equivalent web site) and track/pay attention to how your elected officials vote on things, and hold them accountable (by contacting their office and letting them know, and if that doesn't change things, by changing your vote) for how they vote.
Do research (takes me about twoish hours per election) on people who are on the ballot for those small offices (comptroller, judge, etc.), and make sure you vote in the 'right' ones (aka the ones that fit your preferred world view).
Also, try volunteering from time to time, for people who are running that you think fit what you want to get done in Washington/state office.
And finally, consider running for an office yourself, try it on for size, see how the sausage gets made, etc.
Metaphorically speaking, you got to tend to the Democracy garden, or else the flowers/plants will die.