this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
485 points (85.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5369 readers
687 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
485
Eating Meat Is Bad for Climate Change, and Here Are All the Studies That Prove It (sentientmedia.org)
submitted 11 months ago by veganpizza69 to c/[email protected]
401 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] capital 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Last one is directly connected to the first two lol

Edit: Since the thread got locked I guess I'll have to dunk on the guy below me from here.

Nobody is growing crops “for livestock”.

Damn, that's weird. Because this article shows the majority of US cropland is dedicated to growing food just for livestock. And before you bring up grazing land, that's separated out. There's even nice pictures if the words confuse you.

86% of what they eat are inedible waste, and the other 14% are things they are being grown anyway.

Feel free to source your claims at any time. But even if the 86% number is right, that's crazy that to make up the rest we need the majority of US cropland hu?

Thank you for invalidating the first two arguments by tying them to a propagandist’s fantasy.

I brought fuckin' receipts boy.

Nobody will ever change a zealous vegan’s view, but anyone else that reads this will realize all the coercion to quit meat has nothing to do with valid environmental concerns.

I got to this position based on data (and morals). Feel free to present data at any time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"lol".

Nobody is growing crops "for livestock". 86% of what they eat are inedible waste, and the other 14% are things they are being grown anyway. The most common two feed crops, corn and soy, are being grown for a different part of the crop to be used for industrial purposes. Yes, they feed a little edible corn to cows shortly before slaughter to maximize the return and quality of meat. Nobody is waiting in line for that corn because it's terrible and non-nutiritious calories for humans. If you suddenly passed a law that forced us to euthenize all the cows and threatened us with prison time if we ate meat, those same crops would be grown only to be destroyed in ways that are just as bad (or worse) for the environment as feeding to animals

Thank you for invalidating the first two arguments by tying them to a propagandist's fantasy. Nobody will ever change a zealous vegan's view, but anyone else that reads this will realize all the coercion to quit meat has nothing to do with valid environmental concerns.

Thank you for winning my argument for me.