this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
838 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18968 readers
4305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] superduperenigma 143 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

So let's say we let him run to avoid a violent backlash.

What happens if he loses? We let him overturn the election to avoid another violent backlash?

All we're doing is proving to the fascists that we will kowtow to them if they are angry and violent enough. If we want to remain a free-ish country we're going to have to piss them off at some point by doing the right thing, and we'll need to deal with the fallout.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And if he wins the fascists will take that as endorsement. Whatever they would have done via backlash will become the norm since their present supports it.

[–] teejay 24 points 9 months ago

I really think people either forgot or still don't understand just how close the insurrection was to succeeding. Change one part of Mike Pence's story and we'd be in a whole different -- and much darker -- timeline. There's plenty of evidence that suggests a different outcome if a similar coup is attempted this time. The law is on our side, and so are states' rights, we need to enforce them.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

By 'deal with the fallout', of course you mean apply the law to criminals. Arrest them, charge them, send them to court, let them be convicted, and serve their sentences. Justice delayed is justice denied.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I personally can’t wait. All the 2nd Amendment idiots trying to take on the police and military?

It’d be glorious.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I personally can’t wait. All the 2nd Amendment idiots trying to take on the police and military?

Well, I've got some news for you.

House Republicans All Vote Against Neo-Nazi Probe of Military, Police

[–] RGB3x3 10 points 9 months ago

The call is coming from inside the house

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How many police and military do you think are 2nd amendment idiots?

[–] TheControlled 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Being a traitor and being police/military is not the same. I'm suspicious of police AF but betraying your country is a bigger leap than liking guns.

[–] chuckleslord 5 points 9 months ago

Betraying my country? I'm saving it from this woke mind virus trying to overthrow the people's will! /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Through a lot of the recent bullshit, the police were shaking hands with Proud Boys and turning their heads to miss crimes committed by them. Multiple police forces were entirely dismantled and rebuilt because there were zero salvageable members of them. And that only happened when their behavior got too much national attention.

The "boys club" that is the police takes the above and makes it worse. For most cops, if 1/3 of their force is all doing something, they're going along with it out of fear of rejection or even fear of reprisal.