this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
604 points (96.9% liked)
Games
32921 readers
2340 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When Starfield wins most innovative, that's when you can disregard the rest.
Sifu, TLOU and RDR2 aren’t even from 2023 as well…
What a load of shite.
TLOU Part 1 was a 2023 release, even though it's just a remake but at least I can let that slide. Even SIFU was a 2023 Steam release so I can let that slide. RDR2 is in a category that specifically built for games before 2023. What I can't let slide is giving it the labor of love award. It hasn't been touched since launch and the online component is a gong-show because of it's bugs and cheaters. Even the singleplayer mode had a huge audio bug that affected many people (including myself) and the only work around was getting some guys script that you have to run before launching the game.
It's completely abandoned by Rockstar and does not deserve to come anywhere close to the "Labor of Love" award.
Fair enough about RDR2 being in the right category, even though that’s still wrong 😆
I’m less willing to let TLOU and SIFU slide though, it’s “technically” correct but in reality it’s just stupid for these games to be in 2023 awards.
Remakes in particular boil my piss. They’re lazy, “play it safe” games instead of companies taking risks making new games, so I don’t think they should be eligible for awards imo.
I think there's a right way and a wrong way to do a remake/remaster. If a game doesn't run well on modern hardware and/or its online features are long gone, a remake can be justified. But to be a truly great remaster, it should also improve upon the original without messing with what made it great.
For example, the Age of Empires remasters were phenomenal, and the AoE2 remaster in particular basically revived the entire series. Not only did it add a fresh coat of paint visually, proper HD/widescreen support, stability updates, and such, there's been a pretty solid stream of new content and extended support. And it wasn't even sold as a full-price title to begin with.
But remakes of games that still run fine on modern hardware, don't really add much of anything new, and are priced at or near full-price? Yeah, cheap cash grab. There's no reason to remake a game less than 10 years old.
The TLOU and SIFU remakes shouldn't get as much scrutiny as you're giving them, before the remakes released they were console exclusive, the reason these types of remakes are bad is because some of them are lazy and unplayable at launch (like the TLOU remake). But you're right, they shouldn't have been in the steam awards even if they technically did release on steam in 2023.
What audio problem? because I had issues with my surround sound in which the channels where jumping all over the place. Support wasn't much help and if that was the same problem then I wish I had found that sooner
This is why children don’t get to vote when it really matters.
It's the reason why I don't ever pay attention to gamers' choice awards etc. For all the shit that critics get, usually I agree with their consensus
I voted for without a doubt, which i though was gonna win the most innovative
Some viewpoints would prefer it if you wrote off bg3 that way.
Some viewpoints are actually wrong that way.