AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
view the rest of the comments
What a fucking tool
Forget to take your meds, fascist?
Edit: check this guy's history lol.
You seem to have a lot of hate in your heart, I hope you can let that go.
I'm genuinely surprised I haven't seen a troll on Lemmy until now.
Now it's beginning to feel a bit more like Reddit.
Then your admin is doing a great job because there's plenty of 'em.
Shout-out to @[email protected]
Shout out to you as well 🫡
Nice one dingus boy. Go back to truth social.
The few times I recall prominent¹ people suggesting Trump should be killed they got shouted down by the right and left both. Do you have some examples of this not happening?
¹ Important word here. You might want to check up on what it means before citing idiotic examples.
"Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past." Sartre if its not immediately recognizable.