I think it's pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 59 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Since lemmy can't pull from mastodon/threads, it seems like a complete non issue for now.

[–] Ghostalmedia 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Correct. This is an issue for Masto, not Lemmy. It may never be an issue for Lemmy for all we know. Lemmy is focused on following activity pub communities not individual people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It’ll affect Kbin.

[–] Draconic_NEO 5 points 11 months ago

No offense but Kbin users have a lot more to worry about than the threads issue, considering the amount of development and moderation problems that plague kbin to this day.

[–] beetus 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This thread isn't about kbin though. We don't need to clutch pearls about other services on fediverse when discussing what happens with Lemmy instances.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

But we do need to look out for our peers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Lemmy pull from mastodon if someone from mastodon mentions a user or community of lemmy instance

[–] infinitepcg 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. It seems that Lemmy can see Mastodon users and send private messages to them. And I believe Mastodon users can create Lemmy posts, so potentially Threads users could do that too once Meta enables two-way communication.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It all depends on how the Meta teams implements ActivityPub and which parts of it.