this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

science

15158 readers
713 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

'incredibly profound', not my favorite site. tg for ad blocking. natural fission

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] overzeetop 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a way it's baffling that we have so many "heavy" elements on Earth, given the way they are formed and how (almost) impossibly rare they should be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One reason is that the dust cloud that formed our solar system have already gone through several rounds of of star formation and supernova to seed it with the heavy elements.

The second reason is that when the sun reached fusion and started pumping out the solar wind it pushed a lot of the lighter elements to further out in the solar system. That is why the rocky planets are the inner four and the gas giants are the outer four.

Earth has a much higher proportion of heaviest elements than the proto-cloud (which was metal rich in the first place) because of the second reason.

[–] AngryCommieKender 1 points 1 year ago

Well there's a whole lot more dust out there, that should have similar composition to the solar system. So much so, that every "empty" cubic light year of space contains about 28.8 solar masses. That's a whole lot of everything just floating around waiting for gravity to do its thing and clump them into things.