this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
441 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59064 readers
3515 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
441
Politically-engaged Redditors tend to be more toxic -- even in non-political subreddits (www.psypost.org)
submitted 10 months ago by L4s to c/technology
172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Politically-engaged Redditors tend to be more toxic -- even in non-political subreddits::A new study links partisan activity on the Internet to widespread online toxicity, revealing that politically-engaged users exhibit uncivil behavior even in non-political discussions. The findings are based on an analysis of hundreds of millions of comments from over 6.3 million Reddit users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

100% agree with you. The worst part is the bots are getting better and better. I have a policy that you respond once to clarify and then walk away. These are for obvious bad actors, but now they're seeming more and more like decent people with a flawed idea until you keep talking and realize it's a bot. I don't know how to counteract that.

[–] voidMainVoid 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know how to counteract that.

Simple. You don't. When I'm debating, I'm usually not trying to convince the person I'm debating with. I'm trying to convince a disinterested third party who reads the exchange later.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

I completely agree that it's for the later people, it's just a waste of time for me when it's become a lengthy thread that nobody is going to read anyway.

The other thing they do is a bot attack of taking what people are saying, changing it, and then posting a lot of them to bury comments that they don't want others to see. Not sure how to counteract that either.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How do you know they're actually bots? 90% of the time, when I'm debating with someone who is passionately defending their position, they'll at some point accuse me of being a bot or a shill. I also can't recall any time I've debated someone and have been convinced they are a bot.

I'm just skeptical as it's a convenient ad hominem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

To be totally honest with you, I wouldn't for one second be surprised if the bots are programmed to accuse humans of being bots.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have the same question. How do you distinguish an advanced enough bot from a genuinely dumb person?

[–] aidan 5 points 10 months ago

Or "smart" person. There are almost certainly bots who espouse beliefs that align with yours too.