this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
109 points (76.3% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
4271 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
109
OpenAI was working on advanced model so powerful it alarmed staff (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

OpenAI was working on advanced model so powerful it alarmed staff::Reports say new model Q* fuelled safety fears, with workers airing their concerns to the board before CEO Sam Altman’s sacking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] linearchaos 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-11-20/openai-staff-threaten-to-go-to-microsoft-if-board-doesnt-quit

3 pieces of "information" have been released:

  1. The board fired him primarily for not being honest with them and other things
  2. The signed letter mentioned most employees were upset about his departure and some are willing to follow him
  3. The signed employee letter mentioned the board being scared and limiting how fast to develop due to security was one of the points of contention.

From that information, you have decided that ALL media outlets reports of #3 were falsified by all news outlets, but #1 and #2 are solid.

I'm calling on Occams Razor and saying #3 was damage control from the board rather than all the media outlets faking it.

I'm saying you're "fan boying" because you're giving undue credit to the companies action pushing it over on the media, when the paper signed by 700 employees says the board was incompetent and spreading the information about being scared themselves.

[–] Lemminary 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And yet you missed a very important aspect of fan boying: that I don't give two shits what happens to the company. What I would be doing more accurately speaking is giving the benefit of the doubt and not drawing conclusions based on nothing, which is vastly different.

From that information, you have decided

What the fuck are you on about?

Miss me with your antisocial shit and name-calling and all your bullshit. Get blocked, run-of-the-mill asshole.