this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
234 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19149 readers
3629 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Donald Trump's lawyers have been accused of submitting laughable legal filings, as they say why the former president does not need a gag order ahead of his federal election trial.

Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance was reacting to Trump's legal team saying that threats made to the judge and court staff overseeing the former president's civil fraud trial in New York are irrelevant to arguments as to whether a gag order is needed in the case.

Circuit Court of Appeals is weighing up narrowing the gag order imposed on Trump by Judge Tanya Chutkan in the federal election case to stop him publicly attacking potential witnesses in the trial.

The affidavit added that, since the New York gag order was lifted on November 16, which allowed Trump to resume attacking Greenfield, the law clerk has been receiving around 20 to 30 calls per day to her personal cell phone and 30 to 50 messages on social media and to her email.

"Ms. Greenfield also informed me that, since the interim stay was issued lifting the gag orders on November 16, 2023, approximately half of the harassing and disparaging messages have been antisemitic," Hollon wrote.

In the November 23 filings, Cecil Vandevender, an assistant special counsel for the DOJ, said the affidavit in New York was proof of the ongoing threats and harassment surrounding Trump, which had been requested by the appeals court.


The original article contains 810 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!