this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
114 points (97.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7302 readers
574 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The article talks about how these sorts of contracts have to be tied directly to training costs to be legal. In the first example in the article the contract didn't specify an amount and didn't tie it to, really, anything. So it was legally like coercing someone to stay and work according to the lawyer that took the case.
In my country companies are forced to give a certain amount of hours of free training a year to employees or they pay heavy fines.
They usually fill it up with compliance training bullshit though.