this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
975 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

34988 readers
505 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A nuclear plant can't "produce 24/7 regardless of conditions". Obviously natural disasters affect them. Nuclear plants need water so any flooding or tsunami can affect them. They also need maintenance because they are very complicated water boilers.

They require a lot of educated people to run them, whereas a wind turbine requires a few guys to check on them sometimes. Solar just requires some dudes to brush off the panels occasionally. That can probably be automated too.

[–] TangledHyphae 10 points 1 year ago

Solar's lack of moving parts is something people overlook, too. Hail storms supposedly rarely damage them, and if they do, you can just replace individual panels.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Navy has been operating nuclear submarines for 80 years. You don't have to be that educated

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I used to work with a guy who was a nuclear tech before getting out of the military and he legitimately made me concerned about the level of intelligence they require to do the job.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nuclear is cleaner, safer, and cheaper, though...

[–] Blue_Morpho 3 points 1 year ago

We need a base load until batteries are better but its not cleaner, safer or cheaper. Solar got cheaper than nuclear a few years ago.

[–] gmtom 0 points 1 year ago

It is not, at all. The large amounts of concrete needed for nuclear plants as well as the decommissioning and storage of waste means they are far worse for the environment than wind