Science Memes

11278 readers

4638 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1748

abandonware empires (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RoyaltyInTraining 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forcing companies to release source code once they go bankrupt or abandon a project can only have good results. Yes, it eats into profits of successors, but something being profitable does not mean it's good. If people would rather use decades old code rather than something new, what does that say about the quality of the new code? This would force companies to continuously improve, rather than profit from stagnation. And it would prune away the parts of the economy that contribute nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This comment is based on the assumption that the company manufacturing the lab equipment is enjoying unreasonable profits, which is not necessarily the case.

You can't force companies to support software. They will just attach an impractical though reasonable price tag to continued support. "Sure we can support that microscope, it will cost you 2x the price of our new model".

This would force companies to continuously improve

On the contrary, there's no money to invest in development of newer models if no one will buy them.