this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
352 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
6345 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Discord will switch to temporary file links to block malware delivery::Discord will switch to temporary file links for all users by the end of the year to block attackers from using its CDN (content delivery network) for hosting and pushing malware.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zarxrax 171 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah... In sure malware is the reason. It's not that they don't want people using discord for file hosting.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Still, it’s not a file hosting platform. 🤷‍♂️ it should have been temporary to begin with.

[–] echo64 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It literally is, it's part of their paid plans.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It literally isn't, what the hell are you smoking?

[–] echo64 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you think a service you pay for that lets you upload files to them, to share the files with an unlimited amount of other people, is not a file hosting platform? even though it hosts files for you? and you pay for the service?

what do you think it is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't move the goal posts. It's 100% not an advertised feature to use Discord uploads as cloud storage or an off-platform CDN.

The unintended side effect that you've so clearly described is the exact reason they're implementing the protections in question.

[–] echo64 0 points 1 year ago

So if I sell a paid package that let's you upload files, then I store them and make them available to unlimited other people and put the files on my global cdn to achieve that. But I specifically don't use the magic words in my advertisement. It's not that product it's some magical other nameless thing

Listen, I would be right there with you if this wasn't a paid for feature, but it is. People pay Discord specifically for this. And now discord are neutering that feature because people are actually using it and now discord is mad. Just pay, don't use.

So now people who want to distribute files will end up using mega or whatever and going off app, and for what. So discord saves some money. Fuckin great

[–] Sylvartas 8 points 1 year ago

What ? Pretty sure their paid plans only allow uploading larger files. It says nothing about the longevity of said files on their servers

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They wouldnt have been as popular if they had been temporary from the beginning.

Shoulda woulda coulda, this is now a thing their community has come to expect and rely on their platform being capable of. And the change of such will break a number of channels.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eh if they don’t want people using their service that way, that’s their right. People who care about it that much should host a matrix instance.

[–] echo64 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminder that file uploads on discord more than a few mb is a paid feature.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is typical enshittification. Make an impossibly good service to gain marketshare. Then make it worse once you've eliminated all competition and dominate the market.

[–] Diprount_Tomato -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You make it sound like the initial investments were sustainable

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If their plan was to intentionally make unsustainable investments and then gut features later on, they should be shuttered now before they waste any more users time and money

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Diprount_Tomato 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Initial investments are usually excessively big to secure your position. The main focus isn't to balance the budget, but to have as many earnings and growth as possible to then get rid of the defficit

[–] echo64 1 points 1 year ago

You are describing enshitification. You're missing the point.

Company enters market, disrupts it with money from investors, with featuresets that aren't profitable just to drive out the competition, kills the competition who have to pay for their features and pricings with an actual business, then raise prices and reduce features now you're the only one left.

See music streaming, food delivery, taxies, TV and movie streaming, now game subscriptions are gonna do the same thing. Discord is another example .

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did anything about my comment imply I thought this change was illegal? This has nothing to do with their rights

The issue at hand is taking away a feature your users have come to expect from your product after youve secured a level of dependance by outcompeting the competition

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn’t intend to imply that, my statement can be rephrased as “if users don’t like this change, they should use an alternative, because discord is going to do what makes sense to discord.” File hosting is ubiquitous and cheap, so it isn’t a big deal. I don’t work at discord, but I do work at a company that has file hosting as one of its features, and combating malicious misuse of that feature is expensive and a pain in the ass. If I could get away with not offering file hosting, I’d be tempted to remove it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you think your company could get away with offering a paid service that included file hosting, and then suddenly announcing that the file hosting was now only temporary?

Or would you expect your customers to abandon you over any claims of "just find an alternative"?

E: to clarify, by "your company" I mean where you work. Im not assuming youre at a position of ownership

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The services are way too different to compare that feature in isolation, unfortunately. But discord’s business model is not to be a cdn, and I think it’s a good move to occasionally prune a feature that doesn’t provide enough juice for the squeeze. We’ve seen much worse enshittification this year, and I doubt this move has any measurable effect on their active users. Dealing with getting your servers off of blacklists because some douche decided to host malware on your free file hosting isn’t how anyone wants to spend their days, I assure you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Its not going to effect the causal, non paying active users for sure.

But thats because they arent the paying customers. A lot of people who paid did so for the purpose of upgrading their personal servers, which pretty often included the file storage.

Im not in a ton of servers, but the ones who were community hubs are already discussing leaving discord over this, because the file convenience was the big draw of paying for discord. No idea where they want to move to, but they arent happy about sitting still.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Files are still stored permanently and links inside the client stay permanent as well, only links accessed externally are affected. I don't like Discord either but anyone relying on it as their personal free CDN had it coming for them.