this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
262 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19804 readers
3949 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlights: Former President Donald Trump’s rhetoric has regularly bordered on the incitement of violence. Lately, however, it has become even more violent. Yet both the press and the public have largely just shrugged their shoulders.

As a political philosopher who studies extremism, I believe people should be more worried about this.

Mark Milley, the outgoing chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, is guilty of “treason,” Trump said in September 2023, just for reassuring the Chinese that the U.S. had no plans to attack in the waning days of the Trump administration. And for this, Trump says, Milley deserves death.

But it is not just government officials whom Trump suggests be targeted for extrajudicial killings. Mere shoplifters should be killed too. “Very simply, if you rob a store, you can fully expect to be shot as you are leaving,” Trump said to cheers at the California Republican Party convention in September.

This rhetoric may seem like crazy bluster, which is no doubt why many people appear prepared to ignore it. But put in its historical context, what Trump is doing is echoing views that are part of a long tradition of illiberal and outright fascist thought. For fascists have always seen the use of violence as a virtue, not a vice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In all fairness, I think his rhetoric has been indoctrinated into him by actual fascists he kept/keeps around him, and the Republicans (and a lot of people that are supposed to be against it) facilitate him using it. So while he's definitely a fascist, I don't think he's an ideological fascist.

And that's why, I think, it echoes instead of copies outright.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While you may doubt his genuine commitment to the ideology, the end result will be the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I said to another person, it speaks to his motive. He's motivated by money, and one can't effectively fight an enemy they pretend is something else.

A fascist is a fascist, I agree, but it's best that we know what drives him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Money is just a means to power, and that’s what fascists crave. It may be a circuitous route, but he gets there in the end.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree that it's self-feeding, and fascists will get to the causing of suffering in the end, but what drives that cycle is different, and how you break that cycle is different.

For Trump, it's Money at all costs. For ideological fascists, it's Power at all costs.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Respectfully disagree that it's not an ideologically held belief. But, really, it's a distinction without a difference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Mostly agreed, except it speaks to his motive. He's not motivated by power, he's motivated by money. He'll use that money for power plays to get more money. He'd feed the homeless or kick a puppy every morning if it made him more money.

Both kinds of fascists are dangerous, but it's always best to know your enemy.

[–] MotoAsh 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, let's not call a murderer a murderer simply because it wasn't the killing part that he enjoyed...

Nah, Trump IS a fascist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is exactly what I said. It was literally in the penultimate sentence.

[–] MotoAsh 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"Echoes" is not equivalent to, "literally is". It is equivalent to "sounds like".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Very good. Because I was speaking about his rhetoric, not whether or not he's a fascist, which I already stated in the second to last sentence that he is.

Penultimate = second to last.

[–] JustZ 2 points 1 year ago

And I've been using that word wrong for years.

[–] grue 2 points 1 year ago

There is no such thing as an "ideological fascist." It was purely opportunistic and self-serving when Mussolini did it, and it's exactly the same now that Trump's doing it.