this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
177 points (97.8% liked)

Physics

1332 readers
16 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apart from the face that there are absolutely no “dice rolls” involved. They are known deterministic calculations. Because in order to add “dice rolls” you would need randomness. You can’t have a non deterministic calculation involved, because that isn’t how computers work.

You’re essentially saying “take a knowable input, add true randomness, output true randomness using nothing but knowable inputs!”

And you absolutely can brute force it. Why would you have a single chance? Because of arbitrary rules?

As for true randomness, you’re getting a range of “extreme low to extreme high” which isn’t currently brute forcible.

[–] FooBarrington 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My dude, the "dice rolls" are all the small pieces of entropy that you'd have to know the environment to an unknowable degree for. They are conceptually absolutely involved, and if you can't understand that, we're done here, because you're handwaving over the difficult parts in a way that doesn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Those “dice rolls” are not random though. The problem is you keep talking about these inputs as if they themselves are random. They aren’t. And just because you can’t fathom a way to know their values now, doesn’t mean they are unknowable. I point back to the timestamp issue, where at the time it was considered “enough” but was disproven as such years down the line.