this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
301 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60063 readers
3404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AI is great, I had gotten tired of Shutterstock and needed something to replace stock images.

Not sure it's good for much else though.

[–] matthewc 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We are in the infancy of generative AI. For you it has already replaced an entire sector of the workforce: artists. For others it has replaced them wholesale. For others it just assists. Hollywood was trying to legally own actors voices and likenesses to replace them.

This technology is not standing still. It will be great at a lot of things in the future. It could be next month. It could be next year. It could be in a decade. Whenever it arrives for your job it will be cheaper than you. There will be no going backward on this technology.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I totally agree that we're just scratching the surface of what AI can do. But I don't think it's what Wall Street thinks it is. It's not too terribly difficult to spin up an LLM, which means it's going to be difficult to set up chokepoints to extract rent.

Though I bet they'll get the government's help with that by regulating AI for "safety." The big guys won't have a problem but anyone else will have illegal programs running.

[–] matthewc 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. It isn’t hard to spin up an LLM.

I agree corporations will lobby for a legalized monopoly so they’re able to extract rent.

Generative AI will only grow to replace more and more labor. Labor is most corporations largest expense. Participating in the economy as labor is how most people make their living.

If AI replaces labor, regardless of who controls it, it will change the world’s economy by putting most people out of a job.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. Work sucks. Let robots do it.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This only works if we have a system in place to handle most humans not working. Like a UBI of some kind. Capitalism can't function once there are no more jobs to work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This just gets better and better!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm really confused by these comments. I work on AI and absolutely hate all the clickbait and marketing simple algorithms as actual AI. But this seems like the pendulum swinging way too hard the other way.

To put it bluntly - No, it is not simple or trivial to "spin up" an LLM. Unless you want it to be worse than simple chatbots that have already existed for over a decade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Especially where image generation is concerned, the infancy part can't be understated. It's growing so, so fast. A year ago, people would be dismissing AI art as "you can always tell", it largely couldn't do hands, and text was right out. But current cutting edge models can semi-reliably generate imperceptible works, needing only some fairly trivial manual curation to pick the best output. There's also some models that are now able to do basic text. Just comparing a couple of years worth of progress side by side makes it very clear that it's advancing rapidly and there's no signs yet that it's plateaued.

The big barrier to image generation, though, is profit. The images that it creates are useful, but current understanding is that they can't be copyrighted and there's ongoing legal challenges that make it very murky. I don't think these companies can stay in business from regular people who'll pay for some tokens to generate art. They need to be usable by commercial companies, and the legal issues will scare many of those away, at least for now.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I work in IT, you want a list? Probably be quicker to tell you what it's not doing/replacing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No longer do I have to learn Regex! For that alone AI is worth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a dev, I honestly can't understand that. I probably use regex a dozen times a day. Basic regex is so easy and useful, but describing exactly what you want is so iffy for an AI. The basics of regex are also so easy. It's not like most people are trying to, say, parse an email address with regex. Most usage is basic, like "extract this consistent pattern from this text" or "remove this (simple) parameter from this function". It takes me seconds to come up with a working regex in most cases.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There are many of us, myself included, who struggle with Regex. We are common enough that there is a pretty standard joke among developers that if you have a problem and solve it with Regex, congratulations you now have two problems.

I appreciate what you're saying and you're a god among men if you are proficient in Regex but you're not the norm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you can explain it in a way a graphic designer would understand I would genuinely be interested