this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
2141 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59740 readers
3958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You have to consider all the R&D they put into it.

(Didn't the government pay for most of that?)

[–] hydrospanner 4 points 1 year ago

Right?

In a just world, "the people" would see this pricing, realize that they were the ones who paid for the development of it, and simply seize the company.

Whether that took the form of government litigation to force the company to offer this at a reasonable price, or simply a mob of people forcing the company's hand or else they burn it to the ground, either way, there needs to be a stick of fear to go along with the carrot of profit.

I'm not saying they should make no profit, but this is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Their R&D was releasing it to the public.