World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Fuck Israel for trying to defend against terrorism you mean?
Just ask yourself - if Iran did this to an Israeli city 'in defense of the people of Gaza', who would you be saying to fuck?
I've been saying fuck Israel for years. They've been tearing innocent families out of their homes to occupy their land for their entire existence. No fucking wonder they got radicalized and fight back. It's the same story with the US and Iran man, they helped create all the terrorists that attack them.
Did what exactly?
Look at the pictures in the link. If that was an Israeli city hit by Iran, who would be at fault? Now they are actually of Gaza. Whose fault is it in reality? If you didn't answer Israel to one of those two questions, then you hold that Israel can do no wrong.
If no one would've done terrorism on October 7th, no one would do anything like you see on a photo today. And, oh, how much more would you be upset if Israel would do attacks without a warning, just like hamas does, I can't imagine.
If you have balls to blame Israel for the existence of "kill all Jews" in Palestinians' doctrine, you are out of your mind.
Group A is angry. It shoots missles and kills innocent civilians. Group B states "This will not stand! We must defeat group A and put an end to their killing of innocent civilians!" Group B then shoots missles, but instead of just killing group A, they kill a bunch more innocent civilians. On that last group of civilians, who is to blame for their death? In abstract it should be the ones shooting the missles.
You might be tempted to say it was group A's fault for shooting the first batch of missles, thinking I am referring to Hamas. That is why I made up the (hopefully) hypothetical scenario that group A is Israel and group B is Iran. All I want to get across is those that shoot missles and kill innocents REGARDLESS OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES are to blame for the death they cause.
Group B is unrelated so the whole thing is unrelated.
I'm not proposing to remove all blame from Israel. But its actions are within adequate frame, and it can be investigated and held accountable. This never applies to Palestinians, they won't be prosecuted and will proceed with terrorism if not stopped.
Group B fired missles that killed innocent civilians in both scenarios. Proposing they are unrelated removed all blame from them.
Also, when was the last time any resolution at the UN security council has passed and held Israel accountable? Seems like the whole region has avoided any formal accountability, both Hamas and Israel.
Whatever the UN did wrong, it doesn't mean Israel can be treated like terrorists.
Whatever Hamas did wrong, doesn't mean that the Palestinians can be treated like terrorists.
This is not what's happening.
All the suffering of Palestinians are the result of electing hamas and its actions.
Hamas can stop the suffering immediately by surrendering and releasing hostages.
In what world would either of those things happen?
In a world where a person stabbing themselves with a knife can realize they are only hurting themselves by proceeding, and stop until it's too late. A knife will not stop until the person stabbing themselves with it stops.
As for your take on my words, it's laughable. Describe me a world where a group of people do nothing but build swords, them use them to defeat another group who has guns, then "unsteal" the land they refuse to live without, successfully.
You sure you want to call Israel that, while Gaza is literally controlled by terrorists who vowed to destroy Jews and have been regularly bombing Israel by unreliable missiles?
Yeah because of those same standards (such as when Israel presented a map a few months ago with no Palestine on it, insinuating there wouldn't be Palestinians, which is ethnic cleansing)
Oh wow, a map issue. Genocide! Clearly they must have their citizens killed for it!
The Palestinians that had nothing to do with the terror attack don't deserve to be killed either. One in the same
Hamas thinks different, apparently. If they cared about Palestinians they wouldn't use civillan buildings to fire missiles, for example.
I am not denying Hamas as an extremist organization, even though they bombed that hospital out of incompetence. My point being every true reason you've listed about Hamas are still things Israel has done to Palestinians as well
You mean Israel did something comparable to a sudden violent attack on civilians, killing hundreds and taking hostages? Did it also announce the elimination of all Palestinians as a goal for better future by chance? Do Israeli happily shout "our god is the greatest" when they see missiles launching?
And I don't mean any of this makes killing Palestinian civillians okay. But these are clues that show how they are not adequate. It is normal to see people suffer from their inadequate actions. There is no use in blaming Israel after you start a war against it, just like there is no use in blaming a knife that you stabbed your own throat with.
People can proceed with their sympathy towards Palestinians, and they may even deserve it. But they also deserve all the blame for their poor choices.