this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
449 points (93.6% liked)

World News

39013 readers
3666 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rdri 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If no one would've done terrorism on October 7th, no one would do anything like you see on a photo today. And, oh, how much more would you be upset if Israel would do attacks without a warning, just like hamas does, I can't imagine.

If you have balls to blame Israel for the existence of "kill all Jews" in Palestinians' doctrine, you are out of your mind.

[–] randon31415 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Group A is angry. It shoots missles and kills innocent civilians. Group B states "This will not stand! We must defeat group A and put an end to their killing of innocent civilians!" Group B then shoots missles, but instead of just killing group A, they kill a bunch more innocent civilians. On that last group of civilians, who is to blame for their death? In abstract it should be the ones shooting the missles.

You might be tempted to say it was group A's fault for shooting the first batch of missles, thinking I am referring to Hamas. That is why I made up the (hopefully) hypothetical scenario that group A is Israel and group B is Iran. All I want to get across is those that shoot missles and kill innocents REGARDLESS OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES are to blame for the death they cause.

[–] rdri 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Group B is unrelated so the whole thing is unrelated.

I'm not proposing to remove all blame from Israel. But its actions are within adequate frame, and it can be investigated and held accountable. This never applies to Palestinians, they won't be prosecuted and will proceed with terrorism if not stopped.

[–] randon31415 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Group B fired missles that killed innocent civilians in both scenarios. Proposing they are unrelated removed all blame from them.

Also, when was the last time any resolution at the UN security council has passed and held Israel accountable? Seems like the whole region has avoided any formal accountability, both Hamas and Israel.

[–] rdri 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whatever the UN did wrong, it doesn't mean Israel can be treated like terrorists.

[–] randon31415 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whatever Hamas did wrong, doesn't mean that the Palestinians can be treated like terrorists.

[–] rdri 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is not what's happening.

All the suffering of Palestinians are the result of electing hamas and its actions.

Hamas can stop the suffering immediately by surrendering and releasing hostages.

[–] randon31415 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not what's happening.

All the suffering of the Israelis are the result of electing Likud and its actions.

Likud can stop the suffering immediately by surrendering and returning the stolen land.

In what world would either of those things happen?

[–] rdri 1 points 1 year ago

In a world where a person stabbing themselves with a knife can realize they are only hurting themselves by proceeding, and stop until it's too late. A knife will not stop until the person stabbing themselves with it stops.

As for your take on my words, it's laughable. Describe me a world where a group of people do nothing but build swords, them use them to defeat another group who has guns, then "unsteal" the land they refuse to live without, successfully.