this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
931 points (87.4% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2116 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All 10 of the largest U.S. meat and dairy companies have lobbied against environmental and climate policies, resisting climate regulations, including rules on greenhouse gases and emissions reporting. This is according to a study by New York University, which examined the political influence of the 10 largest meat and dairy companies in the United States.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kicksystem 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I already told you it is true, but it means nothing. Animal agriculture is still an incredibly big part of the problem fucking up the planet right now. I think I have supplied you with enough data for that by now. Maybe read it?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Animal agriculture is still an incredibly big part of the problem fucking up the planet right now

since all of agriculture is only about 20% of our emissions, and we need to eat, i disagree with your analysis.

[–] kicksystem 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps you might want to start citing sources?

why would i? cutting up yours is plenty of fun.

[–] kicksystem 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And this is where I stop communicating with you. Maybe you should reflect on why it is so important to you to be right about something that is so destructive to the planet. Something you want to deny, but don't want to supply any sources for. While at the same time every comment I have written you is backed by sources. You're an asshole.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Maybe you should reflect on why it is so important to you to be right about something that is so destructive to the planet

i just AM right. if i were wrong, i'd admit it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

You’re an asshole.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Something you want to deny, but don’t want to supply any sources for

i don't need to provide any sources, since you haven't actually provided any sources that support your claim.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

neither of those studies support the thesis that it's "mostly animal agriculture that's destroying the planet"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

the study published july this year doesn't say what the fluff piece says it does. it says production of different products has different emmissions, and those consumed by vegans are lower. it doesn't say being vegan reduces the more harmful production levels.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think I have supplied you with enough data for that by now. Maybe read it?

it's cute that you think i dont read OWID