this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
882 points (98.7% liked)

RPGMemes

10322 readers
461 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, that sounds very much like a paladin in unapologetic violation of one or more of their oaths.

[–] xkforce 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... theyre not harming anything good so not really?

[–] learningduck 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But would it kill neutral innocent people?

[–] xkforce 5 points 1 year ago

Are neutral innocent people evil?

[–] ajmaxwell 17 points 1 year ago

I could see a Vengeance Paladin justifying through divine will or whatever

[–] Omnificer 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, blatant murder and assault isn't justifiable to most good deities or codes of ethics, even if the target pings as evil. "Oh this shopkeeper is evil? Guess he dies."

At the least, it's highly illegal most places, so even if there aren't divine consequences there'd certainly be social ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, even when alignment is proof enough you still need trials, and a random person's magic sword isn't exactly reliable proof in itself.

Can it fail? Can it be tricked? Is it a magical effect, or a divine one?

What about people who have done horrible crimes but served their sentence?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You can't expect to wield supreme judicial power just cause you threw a sword at some watery tart.

[–] Klear 7 points 1 year ago

Supreme judicial power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical abuse of a magic item. I mean, if I went around stabbing people just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!