this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
438 points (88.2% liked)

News

22670 readers
3829 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not that easy. There is constant information coming in all the time and intelligent agents need to parse signal from noise. It's not every single bit of intelligence regarding an attack comes into fruition. In fact, it's quite the opposite. This is an extremely difficult signal detection problem, one with lives at stake.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Also they did have radar signatures of the attack incoming but radar tech was new and they didn't trust it.

[–] ericisshort 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Please tell me you’re being facetious, because radar has been in use for more than 80 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

80 years ago is the 1940's. But the report was ignored due to lack of training. The way I heard, it was due to radar being relatively new, untested, and thus untrusted.

[–] ericisshort 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m confused. When did this conversation divert to Pearl Harbor?

[–] bitwaba 3 points 10 months ago

I think they responded to the wrong person. There's a pearl harbor tangent happening above this.

[–] SaiPenguin 1 points 10 months ago

I believe that radar should be read as radar system. That is to say it was a new radar system that had not been fully learned yet not that radar as a concept was new.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would make the radar tech very old and likely you could not trust their work either.

[–] ericisshort 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well by that logic, we should be really suspicious of tech like the wheel or the plow.

[–] nrezcm 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Which is why I have never used a plow before and never plan to.

[–] ericisshort 5 points 10 months ago

Good. And I hope you don’t eat any food that contains ingredients that come from fields, or else you’re buying into big plow whether you like it or not.

[–] WhiteHawk 1 points 10 months ago

Big brain time

[–] Cocodapuf 1 points 10 months ago

What are you talking about?