this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
206 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19564 readers
4400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A public library system in Alabama flagged a children’s picture book as potentially “sexually explicit” because the author’s last name is “Gay.”

The picture book, “Read Me a Story, Stella,” by Marie-Louise Gay is about a girl named Stella who teaches her younger brother the joys of reading, according to the book’s description. The book is volume 7 in a popular series that has sold 2 million copies in 10 languages.

The Huntsville-Madison County Public Library system added the book last month to a list of potentially sexually explicit books to be reviewed and possibly moved out of the children’s sections in its 10 branches, the Alabama Political Reporter first reported.

Jay Hixon, the library system’s public relations director, said in an email Monday that the list was created to “protect the collection from anticipated challenges” and was never intended “as a directive to move or remove materials.”

“The inclusion of the author’s name was the result of a keyword search to identify potentially targeted subject areas,” he said, adding that Gay’s book was never moved.

Hixon noted that the Alabama Public Library Service voted last month to create and post a list of books considered inappropriate for children. The list would be created based on submissions from community members. However, the list hasn’t yet been posted publicly.

He said the library system decided to proactively review its collection “in anticipation of an unprecedented number of book challenges.”

“We initiated the review because we believe that professional librarians, trained in collection development, should be the ones to make decisions about book placement,” Hixon said. “The review encompassed a number of different factors. The list was just a preliminary step to identify materials that might be challenged.”

The library system intended to ensure that books containing sexually explicit content were located in an age-appropriate category, he said.

“Unfortunately, we did not effectively communicate the review process from the administration to the staff conducting it,” Hixon continued. “When we received feedback about the review, we paused our actions. However, we did not pause our conversation about the best way forward with the library and the challenging climate we face.”

Kirsten Brassard, Gay’s publicist at Groundwood Books, said none of the author’s books have ever been censored before, to the company’s knowledge.

Karen Li, the publisher of Groundwood Books, said in an email Tuesday that the company is “deeply disturbed by the autocratic and uninformed censorship of books in the Huntsville-Madison County Public Library system.”

“Although it is obviously laughable that our picture book, ‘Read Me a Story, Stella,’ shows up on their list of censored books simply because the author’s last name is ‘Gay,’ the ridiculousness of that fact should not detract from the seriousness of the situation,” Li said in a statement shared by Brassard.

Most of the 246 books on the Alabama list include keywords such as “lesbian,” “gay,” “gender” and “identity,” local news outlets reported. There are also a few books on the list that focus more on issues of race, according to AL.com, such as “The Hate U Give” by Angie Thomas, which is about a girl who sees her childhood friend fatally shot by a police officer.

“This proves, as always, that censorship is never about limiting access to this book or that one,” Li said. “It is about sending the message to children that certain ideas—or even certain people—are not worthy of discussion or acknowledgement or consideration. This is a hateful message in a place like a public library, where all children are meant to feel safe, and where their curiosity about the world is meant to be nurtured.”

The Huntsville-Madison County Public Library system said in a news release on Sept. 28 that the book review has been stopped and that any books or materials that were previously relocated have been returned or are in the process of being returned to their original locations.

Hixon said the library system is aware that there are concerns regarding the list’s focus on LGBTQ-related books.

“It was not our intent to isolate LGBTQ+ titles,” he said. “The library intends to maintain and retain its collection without compromising service to our diverse community. We will not remove specific titles because individuals or groups may find them objectionable.”

The censorship and restriction of books, particularly those with LGBTQ themes, is not unique to Alabama. A report released last month by the American Library Association found that book challenges have reached historic rates this year. Between Jan. 1 and Aug. 31, a total of 1,915 unique titles have been disputed — a 20% increase compared to the same time period last year, according to the ALA. Nearly all of those titles are about LGBTQ people or race or have authors who are people of color or LGBTQ, the ALA found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Funkymatt 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait for the revised history books renaming the enola gay to enola freedom, and stating it dropped freedom onto Hiroshima.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 year ago

As though revised history books would include Hiroshima. It might make certain students uncomfortable.