World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Yes let's all quote those elections done 16 years ago that lots of Palestinians couldn't even be part of and were never repeated to say stuff like "And Palestinians support Hamas". Let's generalize all the way to hell. Let's make it all black and white.
Sounds to me more like I'm one of those 47%
But no, let's take Brexit numbers and make them black or white.
All I said was that not all Palestinians support Hamas. This is factually correct. It is not something you can dispute.
Do you even read the things you post to me? Look at this
You are making big sweeping statements from an article that contradicts the polarity you are trying to display.
Edit: I just want to add, what a shitty tactic. "If you are really Palestinian"... yes, I'm really Palestinian. I'm registered at the UN as a Palestinian refugee with the right of return. I'm a fucking diaspora. There is no need to deny people their own heritage or identity because of a petty online argument. I've lived my early life in Jordan, surrounded by Palestinian and Jordanian families. I have Palestinian friends. I'm very well aware of Palestinians who support Hamas, and aware that it's not even close to everyone. I'm not stupid enough to generalize and run with it.
I never signed up for Lemmygrad nor do I seem to agree with their opinions. So why should I go there? Because I'm saying that not all Palestinians support Hamas? Like dude, I'm a Palestinian and I don't support Hamas. What do you want me to do in Lemmygrad?
Cool, revolution when? If 47% disagree, it should be pretty quick, that's well beyond the critical mass needed for a successful revolution. Until then don't claim that Palestinians don't support Hamas.
Do we think that every individual in Palestine supports them? No. Do we think Palestinians in general support them? Yes.
Come on, this is a generalization. It doesn't take two people to see this is a blanket statement. Do you agree it's a blanket statement?
If this is what you are trying to say, then you are both (1) bad at expressing it, and (2) incorrect.
(1) if this was your point form the start, why not say this instead of a blanket statement? and (2) where is the "in general" in a survey with an almost perfect split in the middle and with support for Hamas changing every year, increasing during times of conflict and trauma, and decreasing during times when Hamas is shit at managing Gaza as a residential area?
To reiterate:
No. That would be bad math and almost intentionally misreading the situation to polarize it.
Edit: I just want to comment on this part
So you've set a personally high bar for Palestinians, this is not a situation that is reasonable or would happen easily or would help us make any conclusion. This is like saying, "Israel in general supports Netanyahu because no one has started a revolution yet."
Now it starts to sound stupid, you see.
Does it, though? You might be mistaking me as someone who's on Israel's side or who's picking any side in this. My stance is that both sides suck and that yes, some revolution would be real nice on both sides.