this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
96 points (96.2% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
888 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under the pretense of fortifying digital security in the United States, newly proposed legislation seeks to transform the United States Postal Service (USPS) into a hub for digital IDs. Senators Ron Wyden, a Democrat, and Bill Cassidy, Republican, have put forth the bill known as the Post Office Services for Trustworthy Identity Act. The proposed legislation opens new discourse on digital privacy and the potential for abnormal surveillance measures, sparking debate over the delicate balance between biosecurity and preserving citizens’ fundamental rights.

We obtained a copy of the bill for you here [PDF].

The proposed legislation comes in response to the piecemeal approach taken towards biometric identification in America. Historically, disjointed programs have been created by different states and separate agency undertakings, giving rise to the necessity for a more coherent national strategy. The Post Office Services for Trustworthy Identity Act could mark a landmark shift, focusing on service provision rather than overarching digital ID strategy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm gonna be real, we do need an actual id system in the US. Right now we treat social security numbers like one, but they're extremely insecure.

We're going to have a number either way, may as well have one that isn't as easy for scammers to steal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m curious. What would make a different number more secure than a SSN?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SSN's main issues are that it's hard to change, and it's predictable. If they know your date of birth and where you were born then they can reliably determine your SSN. And once your SSN is out, it's very difficult to change unless your identity was already stolen.

I have no idea why you just asking a question got down voted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense. Even just being able to easily change it on your own would go a long way. I have a hard time seeing public key cryptography really catching on for something like this, but maybe it will.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Because it would be a private key associated with a public key

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You wouldn't use a number, you would use something closer to a yubikey/passkey.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right now we treat social security numbers like one, but

They were never meant to be used that way. The solution is to stop using them that way. We do not need a digital-compatible id system in the US.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We definitely do need one. Right now it's a hodge podge of crap that wasn't meant to be an identifier and it makes identity theft easy, and our privacy isn't even being protected because we still have an SSN and tax ID.

Having worked in the medical space, a lack of identifier is actually a huge issue that causes problems for people daily, especially people changing their names for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it would be better to do everything with accounts that are not necessarily permanently connected to a person's identity. Any government mediated, definitive system for identifying people is way too risky from a general privacy and freedom perspective.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government can already identify you, and your identity is easy to steal. Making a better ID system just removes the identity theft issue.

The other nice thing would be you could use the id number instead of your name so you can stop giving your PII out to every business. Just "here's my ID number, bill my insurance, you don't need anything else."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government can already identify you, and your identity is easy to steal.

Fixing both of these problems would be better than just one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The issue is that the surveillance state is actively bad, and expanding it and making it more official is a much bigger problem than the problem of ill-conceived verification systems, which could be better solved other ways. I don't want things to be perfect, I want to prioritize moving away from a dystopian panopticon.