this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

MSP - Managed Service Providers

169 readers
1 users here now

Want more MSP Goodness? Join our live chat servers.

MSPs R Us (Discord) http://msp.zone

MSPGeek (Discord & Slack) https://mspgeek.org/join-us/

IT Pool Party (Slack) https://itpoolparty.com/

Our RMM Spreadsheet http://rmm.msp.zone

Our PSA Spreadsheet http://psa.msp.zone

MSP Exchange Wiki https://wiki.msp.exchange/

(Copied from /r/msp)

[email protected]

[email protected]

Rules

1. Technical Support Request

Please refrain from posting technical support requests. These should be directed to techsupport or sysadmin (above).

2. Repeated question

Your post is something that is submitted on a regular basis (probably more than once or twice per week.) Please try searching /c/msp for your answer before posting. If you still have questions, please rephrase your posts and re-submit it to try and make it more specific. We encourage fresh content :) Thanks!

3. Vendor Promotions and Webinars

Vendor participation is encouraged. Feedback and assistance can be invaluable. However, promotion of any products, including webinars, must be kept to the Weekly Promo thread.

Vendors are requested to identify themselves by either username or vendor flair.

4. No personal attacks or inflammatory language

We're forum for a group of professionals. Language and comments must be semi-professional. Refrain from using Insults, vulgar language and other harassing behavior.

5. Tax and legal questions are not allowed.

The purpose of this sub is to share business practices, discuss vendors, and share experiences. Tax and legal advice is best left to those professionals. This includes the sharing or requests for MSAs and other legal contracts.

6. VoIP questions outside of MSP programs.

Please refrain from posting questions and requests that deal with VoIP outside of MSP programs. These should be directed to ~~/r/voip~~ (No such community exists yet) or a similar board that specializes in the subject of VoIP. We are strictly a subreddit for MSPs.

7. Security Disclosure

Security reports are welcome, but we highly recommend to follow responsible disclosure. If you are unsure of who to contact, feel free to contact our team using the buttons below.

When very high risk issues are posted, the mod team might temporarily hide the post until we have confirmation of responsible disclosure.

8. No Surveys, Market Research, etc...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In general the users of r/msp are all about reselling propriety products and services. So I'm curious if any of them would move to lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm here too but I haven't seen much activity from the few of us that have migrated. I won't go back to reddit but I fear most of the MSP community will stay there at least for the time being.

I agree that MSPs mainly push proprietary but there is a growing sub-community of us that still advocate for FOSS where we can, and use strictly FOSS products for their personal tech. I hope to see at least many of those people migrate here. CIPP users and the CyberDrain and MSPGeek communities are filled with these people for example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am one of the few. I make use of FOSS and support it when possible.

It's annoying that msp is so against using Foss.

With Microsoft and Google pushing everything to the cloud. Foss is going to grow in the business market.

Synology & OnlyOffice is a great combination to keep your office documents offline.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well to be clear, the difference between offering Open Source vs proprietary can be significant.

In the Enterprise space, they have the finance, experience (i.e. Management is comfortable with proprietary), and can easily find expertise across all their vendors. So when they need say, a telephony solution for a business unit that is different from the primary Corp solution, they can be confident any vendor will be comfortable working with windows, domains, etc. So it's not just about in-house support capability.

Then there's the whole risk management aspect of enterprise. No manager is going to sign off on the risk of using open source, when a well-known proprietary solution exists, or perhaps there are multiple proprietary solutions to choose from, and since they're all from large vendors they can contractually offload the risk of those systems to the vendor implementing them.

In a nutshell, proprietary provides a predictable cost for performance that they're familiar with. Predictability is practically the primary goal for enterprise IT, even if cost is greater.

When looking at SMB, part of their challenge is similar, in that they're often paying a vendor to manage their systems, and again, the known-quantity of well-established options is hard to overcome. How many SMB vendors have extensive OSS expertise in staff, vs how many are familiar with the mainstays?

If I were managing an SMB support org, no way would I offer OSS - it does nothing to help me reduce risk, minimize hours, etc. It may cost significantly less for my clients, but that's frankly a whole lotta not my problem. From a stability, predictability, support standpoint, mainstay is just easier to support and manage.

Picture a modest SMB support org, with 20 engineers, probably 50 or more clients. You also then need a help desk for those simpler issues that don't require an engineer's time (password resets, software config, etc). So I'm gonna say 10 people on the help desk. Where do you find a large enough pool of talent to interview for help desk that has OSS expertise?

Also, once you're paying for MS licenses, you're sucked in. Again, the devil you know.

I despise SAAS, cloud everything, etc. Google can pound sand, with MS in the front of that line. But they still provide what businesses are looking for, and that's really hard to work against. Not saying we shouldn't keep pushing, just providing a perspective as someone who's worked in both Enterprise and SMB, and I still have friends in both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For my clients, it's all m365. Except for their router, and backup solutions.

The solutions are paid, but the software is OS. Unifi, pfsense, Synology, sync...

In the msp realm, there's always someone who doesn't understand FOSS. And their knee jerk reaction is, "No!"

If an open source project offers a support package, imo, it's generally OK to use. Means the project is, or is attempting to be, a profitable business.

Bookstack, Odoo, OnlyOffice come to mind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, it's just a tough sell, given how management thinks. I get both sides, and praise anyone who promotes OSS. it's not easy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless the product is good

I shout out the creator of bookstock as often as I can on Reddit. He's pretty active there.

https://reddit.com/u/ssddanbrown/s/BbeDEVVYoi

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ooh, Bookstack looks like it could be my own personal wiki, maybe get me away from OneNote. Thanks!