this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

11129 readers
32 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl0z5Z8bvro

In this video Seth talks about quantum orges, or what I call Schrodinger plot point. He had a mostly positive view. So do I, in fact I wa blinded sided that some people see this thing in a bad way.

What is everyone's view on this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] tidy_frog 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No matter what fork you take, you run into ogres.

Even if it is immediately a false choice, the point of the fork in the road isn't necessarily one of immediacy.

A poor DM will run the same exact campaign no matter what fork you take.
A good DM will still have the choice you make have impact, even if the immediate result no matter which way you go is a pair of ogres.

Maybe, if you go left you choose to save the prince rather than the princess. Yes, no matter which way you went you were going to encounter the ogres and it's only the hostage that's different. However, if the one you don't save gets killed by the Basilisk-knight, that means you got to make a choice that impacts the campaign.

It just didn't put you into conflict with the knight that the DM hasn't written up yet. That's next week.

[โ€“] joel_feila 2 points 1 year ago

that is pointed out in the video you can have the same encounter but different context for it.