this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
385 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

57556 readers
3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Grace Hopper Celebration is meant to unite women in tech. This year droves of men came looking for jobs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (22 children)

ITT: men who can't ever admit they might be the problem. So many excuses here it's pathetic.

edit: I love the "not all men" and "not me". As always, it's not all men. But it's enough. And the men here getting so defensive really prove the point. And before anyone gets into it, it's not really the sex or gender. It's the societal expectations and allowances that encourage men to engage in abusive shit like we see in the article here. I.e. the patriarchy and those who support it.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can you expound on that statement?

It sounds as if the organizers were too quick to take the $650 from attendees and those willing to pay were very eager to pony up the cash in the hope of networking.

[–] TwilightVulpine 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The attendees should be able to tell that they would be intruding even if the organization didn't bother to check that. Both were in the wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

How would they separate those intruding and those who the event was made for? Seems like a hard issue to solve

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sudneo 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Problem for what?

I exist, I need a job to live, I have job, I try my best not to be an asshole, I fight (and vote) for a better society, for social and civil rights.

Why exactly I - since I am a man I feel included in your statement - should be THE problem?

[–] Touching_Grass 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I try my best not to be an asshole

Maybe people are getting too in the weeds with this because muh culture war

But it is an asshole move to show up to an event meant for one group of people when the original issue is how over represented your group is. I'm a developer. The grind sucks. But I would be an asshole to show up to this.

[–] sudneo 18 points 10 months ago (17 children)

But it is an asshole move to show up to an event meant for one group of people when the original issue is how over represented your group is. I’m a developer. The grind sucks. But I would be an asshole to show up to this.

If I was out of job, I would honestly care less about the fact that "my group" is over represented. There is no white male lobby that pays my mortgage. That said, I - as in the actual me - would not go to such event either, but that's also because I wouldn't go to any job fair atm since I don't need a job.

[–] Touching_Grass 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I would honestly care less about the fact that

Sure, that's what makes people behave like assholes. "I don't care about X" is why we have a pretty shitty world in many areas.

[–] sudneo 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is pure rhetoric, I can flip the argument:

"You care more about the gender than about my material condition."

Also, the moment I need to let prevail abstract concepts over my material condition (i.e., caring about "my group" being over represented while I am out of a job) is the moment in which the class unity is broken. Me and those women who are out of a job have so much in common that there is no reason for me to consider us part of two separate groups. That's the whole point of my argument, I advocate for worker solidarity and I absolutely feel that this attitude is overall harmful for it.

[–] Touching_Grass 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't agree. I can be at a disadvantage and still accept that another group has even greater disadvantages that I would continue or make worse by stepping into something they built. Its freeloading in a pretty assholish way. I'm not just some animal trying to get a nut with narrow focus that says fuck everything else. I can job search and find my own opportunities without freeloading

[–] sudneo 4 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Let me say this: to me this seems the completed detached thought of someone who never faced material difficulties.

I can only think this if I am in a position of privilege where I can choose. I absolutely can't relate with any of this, I completely agree to disagree.

[–] Touching_Grass 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would only make sense coming from a position where you assume people have no sense of integrity.

First issue is assuming your material difficulties is some how superior to others.

Second assuming the only thing that matters when facing material difficulties is how to advantage only yourself.

Lots of people in life are capable of enduring difficult times while also sacrificing or placing themselves behind others. I don't see how you don't understand that. I can promise you I have faced and continue to face many difficulties which all have taught me life lessons. One of the most important lessons is that overcoming those times by hurting others is not a position I enjoy.

[–] sudneo 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

people have no sense of integrity.

I genuinely think this has nothing to do with integrity.

First issue is assuming your material difficulties is some how superior to others.

This is not an issue, it's absolutely normal, because I am aware of my material difficulties, while I am not aware of other people's one to the same extent. I can't decide not to buy a house because by doing so I increase the demand, which increases prices and makes it harder for poor people to afford housing. You are putting the burden to address a systemic issue on another victim.

Second assuming the only thing that matters when facing material difficulties is how to advantage only yourself.

I am not saying this is the only thing that matters, but I am saying it matters, and I think it's completely unfair to think that people shouldn't take care of themselves. I turn my eye to the mechanisms that create the scarcity that put me and a woman to fight for resources, not on either one of them.

Lots of people in life are capable of enduring difficult times while also sacrificing or placing themselves behind others. I don’t see how you don’t understand that.

Again, I think we have simply too different of a perception of what means a difficult time. Sorry, but this argument to me sounds as complete madness.

One of the most important lessons is that overcoming those times by hurting others is not a position I enjoy.

So not only I am forced to sell my labor to survive, which is the only chance I have, but when I do I am anyway hurting others. So what are my options? Suicide? Any job I am going to take, whether it comes though this fair or not, I am taking it potentially from an under represented category, be it a woman, an old person, black folks, LGBTQ+ community, etc. So I should just stop working?

I will say more, if you carry on your line of reasoning further, any of the people working in tech is US are participating in a system that in a bigger scale hurts people from third world countries (thinking for example of labor exploitation) and pollutes the planet. So what should people do?

The working class should build solidarity, should develop a consciousness that allow them to fight united against the system that creates arbitrary scarcity of resources, not self-police and create a hierarchy to split the crumbles among themselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I would be an asshole to show up to this.

That's the part I really don't get. If you're cis male looking for a job, do you really think crashing this event is going to reflect favorably on you and that you'd be more likely to land a job? People are going to look at you and think that you have good judgment and won't be a problem at all? What the heck is the thought process that makes this a good plan?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nindelofocho 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

seriously this happens a lot people will go off and say word for word that a whole group of people are evil and bad when its a subset of a group. When called on it they may simply say that its not talking about the group as a whole or “not for you” if they dont genuinely believe the whole group is bad (which is wrong and discriminatory)

The issue is the discrepancy of what you say in relation to what you mean will lead others to believe in what you say but not what you mean and this harms those just trying to survive normally.

[–] LPThinker 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The first comment literally wasn't talking about a whole group of people, they were talking about the men in this thread leaving comments that illustrate the exact reason why this space created by and for women and non-binary people should be about and for the benefit of women and non-binary people.

[–] sudneo 6 points 10 months ago

It also didn't explain why, nor made the distinction you are making. So yeah, it was a blanket statement to karma farm on Lemmy...

[–] Fedizen 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Being an asshole is not illegal. Obeying the law doesn't mean you're a good person.

If these dudes were - as the article quotes describe - pushing, shoving, cutting in line then like I don't see why you feel you need to identify with these particular dudes.

You can absolutely wait until some guy actually is being unfairly treated before dying on this hill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Great Parks and Rec episode

[–] derf82 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It’s abusive to checks notes apply for a job?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)