this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
1511 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

45753 readers
1975 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dojan 109 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Didn’t they kill babies too?

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They also said "Chocolate without slavery? That's unpossible!"

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 25 points 1 year ago

The crimes against humanity are what make it so tasty!

Well, that and the heaps of refined sugar.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's every large chocolate company though. Nestle just said the quiet part out loud. Even the ones that promise to use "ethical chocolate" are either unverifiable in their claims to begin with and/or have been exposed to be outright lying.

[–] themeatbridge 19 points 1 year ago

There are smaller chocolate brands that do have verifiably ethical chocolate. The big companies do everything they can to crush those chocolatiers specifically. Often they do this by spreading rumors about how ethical chocolate is unverifiable or a lie.

It is tough, because there are so many intermediaries in the business, but it would actually be much easier for the larger corps because they have more resources and better leverage. There are also companies that just lie for profit.

Nestle could, with minimal effort, insist on a functional chain of provenance, and could easily fund all of the enforcement and verification efforts with money that fits into rounding errors on their balance sheet. They won't, because that helps every chocolate producer avoid supporting slave labor, and eventually it would go away. They want the waters muddy so they can continue to abuse children living in impoverished conditions for profit, while saying "yes, but nobody can verify their chocolate isn't prepared by child slave laborers."

[–] OrteilGenou 3 points 1 year ago

From now on, no slavery.

Your honor I object!

And why is that, Nestle?

Because it's devastating to my bottom line!

[–] Carighan 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, or well, in theory their formula works, but given the realities of developing countries they knew they were killing babies when they introduced it there.

Didn't matter, made profits, line went up.

[–] Viking_Hippie 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they marketed baby formula (which you need to add water to) as much safer than breast milk in areas of Africa without access to clean water. Led to thousands of babies dying 🤬

[–] Haziiieeeeeee 6 points 1 year ago

My comment was going to be. For poisoning a bunch of African children.

[–] Glifted 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)