Is that something to get fired over though? There's still context missing here - assigning a non-approved book alone seems like something you reprimand someone over, not fire them. Was there something particularly egregious about that particular version of the book?

[–] SARGEx117 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if you've ever read her diary, or the ORIGINAL diary, but the original non-edited version, she goes into detail about her sexuality and specifically about another girl. Her father basically ripped out/omitted pages out of shame.

Since the version the school approved was the same version just graphic novellized, you can bet a Texas school did NOT approve the original version.

[–] Nurse_Robot 10 points 1 year ago

Texas is a failure to their students.

[–] assassin_aragorn 4 points 1 year ago

If I'm understanding it correctly, this book was on the suggested reading list they sent parents. So it was unapproved but also suggested...?