this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
399 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

59224 readers
3008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube suspends Russell Brand from making money off his channel — The suspension comes following the publication of rape and sexual assault allegations against the British star::YouTube has blocked Russell Brand from making money off its platform and the BBC pulled some of his shows from its online streaming service in the wake of rape and sexual assault allegations against the comedian-turned-influencer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Since when did innocent until proven guilty stop being a thing? Not defending anyone here, just seems that principle is all but forgotten in modern society.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's only a legal principle - he's not in jail, is he? Individuals and organizations can do whatever they want. It has nothing to do with modern society.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Punishing people based on accusations isn’t just.

[–] legion02 4 points 1 year ago

Is this him being punished or YouTube protecting it's brand?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Since when are corporations actions based on justice?

[–] JustZ 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, punishment by the state based on accusations isn't just.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

He should be able to sue youtube for a nice settlement (if he is in the right), maybe? Idealistically, that should keep such bullshit in check.

But then again, youtube probably has "Youtube reserves the right to do fucking anything to you" in its TOS that everybody just skips.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He should be able to sue youtube for a nice settlement (if he is in the right), maybe? Idealistically, that should keep such bullshit in check.

But then again, youtube probably has "Youtube reserves the right to do fucking anything to you" in its TOS that everybody just skips.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Youtube cutting off their monetisation is not the same as putting the person in jail.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] Stabbitha 6 points 1 year ago

You did though. Innocent until proven guilty is a legal concept, not a business concept. Businesses are allowed to choose who to do business with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Because cutting off monetisation has nothing to do with being proven guilty or not.

[–] KillAllPoorPeople 2 points 1 year ago

Then why are you framing your post like it was? If you get accused of raping a woman and you're going on live TV wearing your employee uniform defending yourself, your employer is firing you 10 out of 10 times.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's the only context innocent until proven guilty ever existed, so yeah, you actually kind of did

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Smoogs 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re literally quoting a law that is used in court about penalties and it’s still up there. You forgot to delete before saying you didn’t say it. You’re both lazy and stupid.

[–] Slagathor 8 points 1 year ago

It's not the legal system, it's a heartless corporation trying to maximize their revenue. Capitalizing on the situation.

[–] JustZ 6 points 1 year ago

That's for criminal liability to attach. Not public opinion.

[–] newthrowaway20 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You do realize that innocent until proven guilty only applies with the government, right? Normal people and companies do not have to extend the same luxury. Hell our military doesn't even give that luxury.

[–] ilikekeyboards 1 points 1 year ago

I've been accused and then shunned after some valuables went missing at a house party.

I was the only minority. Nobody dared to stand up for me and everybody just pointed fingers to the weakest individual.

Branded as a thief despite my life long upstanding morality, career, ethics.

[–] 5BC2E7 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It applies to morally sound people as well as in law.