this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
810 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18073 readers
3166 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It already didn’t look great for Lauren Boebert when she got kicked out of a Denver theater for being disruptive during a performance of the Beetlejuice musical — or when video emerged of the voluble Republican congresswoman being escorted out of the theater. But that was hardly the end of this saga. A second video showed Boebert vaping in front of a pregnant woman, who claimed that the lawmaker refused to stop doing so when asked. The story really went nuclear when a third surveillance video leaked, showing that Boebert and her date were getting awfully comfortable with each other during the show.

Unfortunately for Boebert’s campaign to rebrand as a normal lawmaker, more juicy details keep coming out. Boebert — who has condemned drag shows in the past — was co-groping at Beetlejuice with an Aspen bar owner whose establishment hosts drag shows and participates in an event called Aspen Gay Ski Week. “I learned to check party affiliations before you go on a date,” Boebert told TMZ, although the pair have been reportedly seeing each other for months now.

In an interview with OAN, Boebert, who has been arrested four times, said that she is “very known for having an animated personality.” But the private incident in public is having a big impact on her professional life, distracting from her effort to impeach President Biden. Days after the incident, she was removed from the list of speakers for the Texas Youth Summit later this month.

At least she has her defenders. In a long Facebook post published Monday, Boebert’s ex-husband, Jayson, said he shared the blame for the incident, claiming that his acts of cheating “broke her down.” While it’s odd to have your recent ex-husband come to your defense for getting handsy in public, Jayson Boebert is something of an expert in this realm, having once been arrested for exposing himself to a teenager at a bowling alley.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 89 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'd like to see her face charges. If you or I did something like this, we would be registered sex offenders. You'd think the party of "law and order" would be calling for her to step down and face the music...

[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You’d think the party of "law and order" would be calling for her to step down and face the music…

Nah, it's only a problem if the other tribe does it.

[–] shalafi 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Democrats would be screaming for a resignation, and they would get it. Appalling the GOP skates over shit like this, with zero shame.

I'm sure she's getting a solid talking to, behind closed doors.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Democrats would be screaming for a resignation, and they would get it.

See: Al Franken

[–] Drivebyhaiku 5 points 9 months ago

Republicans operate on a very strict internal "no accountability" model. A "whataboutism" isn't just a defense to the outsider it is a thought terminating measure to the party member. They are trained when approached with fault to immediately and thoughtlessly dismiss it and turn around and point at some form of impropriety elsewhere. Their presidential candidate has provably done any number of things - at this point criminal and immoral - but a lot of them defend him by saying that they don't care if it's true because they would still vote for him even if it was.

The left ( the Democrats to a far lesser degree) however is accountability hungry. If one of their own is prone to gross hypocrisy most people will turn on them like a pack of wolves and work to fully contextualize it to determine exactly how much "fuck that guy" should be applied. Did they apologize? Do they understand what they did and have it properly explained ? Did they mean it? Did they try to defend themselves for the indefensible or did they properly take their lumps ? Is the mistake such that a genuine promise to do better is enough that further consequences should be applied or does this damage this person's character so much that they can never be trusted again?

The different mindsets are irreconcilable to each other. Republicans can't generally understand the nature of the leftist distain for the Democrats as "the party with a more tolerable tab of lukewarm behaviour that will be voted for in absence of an actual paragon". But they recognize it as a weakness that they can exploit.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Rather than calling out their hypocrisy I like to just call them out for what they actually believe. When they say "law and order" it is a dogwhistle. And they don't believe in egalitarianism when it comes to the law or anything else. Rules for me and not for thee because they believe they exist higher up in a socioeconomic "hierarchy". So they don't deserve to go to jail for public display of sex but the "others" they perceived as below them deserve to go to jail for performing a drag show.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like to just call them out for what they actually believe.

They don't. Republicans and right-wingers in the US don't actually believe in anything. The only thing they believe in is power. They will say and do anything to obtain and retain it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Cult 45 believes in what they're told to believe.