RPGMemes

10422 readers

568 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

422

Counting arrows? (diyrpg.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] who8mydamnoreos 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yah having a sharpshooter hide behind cover and snipe every battle every turn makes encounters boring sorry. You just think “thats all rouges can do” because with unlimited arrows it kinda forces them into that mold. Just because you are not doing max damage every turn does not mean you are underpowered. Also you need to drain the resources of the party to balance and create the proper tension which is absolutely critical to proper storytelling. That time where the Big bad is slain by the final arrow of the ranger is epic tense moment.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you play in a specific way and find it boring, THAT is a good reason to switch your playing style.

If I love to snipe from afar and now I cant because arrows are a very rare commodity in this world, this isnt fun. The moment you are forced down a path is where it stops being fun, because its not your own choice.

I have a player. He does that, shoot arrows. And he has fun. I dont need to limit his fun for it to exist.

Counting arrows is like encumbrance in videogames. Its fun for some, and a rapid hassle for most, and you should be able to choose which you wanna play with as a player instead of being forced to use it a specific way.

Options are always great. Their nonexistence is never good. Unless you just so happen upon a table or a videogame that their only option is the one you prefer purely on luck.

[–] who8mydamnoreos 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes people like to snipe from afar because you get to attack without putting yourself in danger, it’s powerful. There are restrictions to balance that. I wouldn’t let a Barb play where they could carry unlimited health potions or a Wiz play with their spells coming back on a short rest. It makes the game unbalanced. Also arrows don’t have to be “rare” just limited somehow between rests. Rouges use items, thats the resource you have to drain from them in order to create a really good tension. Its the difference between mediocre and memorable storytelling.

[+] [email protected] -7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arrows are 20 for 1 gold piece. Potions are 50 gold piece for the smallest. Spell scrolls are tens if not hundreds of gold pieces each.

Are you telling me youre gonna make them all the same price then ?

Btw, wizards can get some of their spells on a short rest.

If you need to restrict the amoubt of arrows to make your game balanced, it means you are very good at tailoring encounters to your current party and should restrict everything to make it even easier on you. After all, restrictions is how you have fun.

Its not like players like finding loot after all.

One last thing. Are you also limiting cantrips ? Or is a warlock shooting eldritch blasts with the spell sniper feat destroying your very good preparations ?

[–] who8mydamnoreos 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t charge money for arrows thats too tedious.

Yes im good a tailoring encounters, im a Great DM. I have had plenty of happy rouges in my groups. If you would trust me if we played im sure I could show you how its fun. However if you demanded to play your way I would kindly ask you to find a different group.