this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
437 points (90.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35882 readers
3697 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that happening with Putin now?

[–] Duamerthrax 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda. There's a really good chance he only invaded Ukraine because a Yes Man told him it would only take a few days and the west wouldn't get involved. >

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Oh I'm fairly certain that's what happened.

[–] SCB 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the entire point of declaring (even informally) a reasonable Cassus Belli

Russia does not have a reasonable reason to go to war with Ukraine that is not "we want that land"

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think there's any good reason for two countries to go to war. It's weird you would say wanting land is a justification. Russia's stated reason was and is for a security buffer against NATO. It's not justified but I don't understand why you're pretending it's not the reason.

[–] SCB 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

NATO wasn't in Ukraine, Ukraine had pledged not to join NATO as part of their disarmament, and the attack on Ukraine encouraged more countries to join NATO.

If "a buffer against NATO" was the actual goal, that existed in post-Maidan Ukraine already, and the invasion directly counteracts that goal.

Also their stated reason was denazification of Ukraine, which is pretty much just rejected by the international community as an unreasonable CB.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There were several goals stated. It's clear to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that denazification was meant for domestic politics. The Minsk accords were never implemented and Merkel bragged about it being a small tactic to arm the Ukrainians. I suppose we'll see who ends up writing the history books to see which of us is right.

[–] SCB 0 points 1 year ago

The US and EU will write the history books, regardless of who wins the war.

Effectively, those two are the world, despite being a minority population. That's just the way the geopolitical cookie crumbles.