PCGaming

6623 readers

8 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

CSFFlame

Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 year ago by inclementimmigrant to c/pcgaming

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And we just the official bullshit of "Well it runs on my PC just fine." from a developer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] V0lD 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Anything below 60 on your specs should be considered unacceptable

I don't think you realise how good your specs are

Hell, I'd say the same about 120 tbh. Modern games are just unoptimised pieces of shit

[–] Nfntordr 0 points 1 year ago

I know my specs and i'm playing native, no FSR and haven't encountered any stuttering. What am I gonna do? Not play the game because it dips below 60 fps? I've been on FPS counter bandwagon and I prefer peace and simple enjoyment over FPS anxiety - for me the counter is only if/when required.