this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
348 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
1739 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it is the fact that our blood contains iron. I earlier used to believe the word stood for some 'organic element' since I couldn't accept we had metal flowing through our supposed carbon-based bodies, till I realized that is where the taste and smell of blood comes from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CADmonkey 76 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Speaking as someone who grew up in the 1980s...

Micro-SD cards almost don't make sense to me. I'm not saying I don't believe in them, because of course I have a few of them. Obviously they exist and they work. But. They're the size of a fingernail and can hold billions of characters of data. I uwve a camera that ive put a 128 GB microSD card in. A quick tap on the calculator tells me that's over 91,000 3.5" floppy disks. Assuming they're 3mm thick, that's a stack of disks 273 meters tall. But this card is so tiny that I have to be careful not to lose it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about the new 2Tb m.2 drives? Not only vastly larger yet still, transfer speeds are also insane. I once had a computer with a 20Mb hard drive, current drives transfer 600-1200mb per second.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not so impressive, of course its faster when its smaller. The data have to travel shorter.

Jk, it is damn impressive!

[–] rtxn 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Actually, that's true! It's not significant enough to affect the throughput directly, but when you transmit data on parallel leads, they have to be roughly the same length in order to keep the signals synchronised with the time frames when they are received. Otherwise part of the data might not arrive in time. The higher the throughput (and shorter the frames), the greater the leads' lengths affect the timing. This is why you often see long squiggly leads on circuit boards - they extend the shorter leads to roughly the same lengths.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, parallel hasn't been used for a while already. SATA literally means "Serial ATA" and no longer uses parallel connections. I haven't seen parlallel connectors since like a decade or so

[–] rtxn 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't talking about connectors, I was talking about circuits inside the devices. Even if something is as simple as a clock and a data signal travelling in parallel, timing is still an important factor.

[–] Agent641 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I saw 1tb microsd cards for sale at the shops the other day and had a bit of a 'what the fuck...' moment

[–] CADmonkey 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember my parents talking about some thing or other in star trek that would be impossible because you'd need "terabytes of storage, and that's probably not possible". And now you can go buy 1 tb of storage and lose it in your couch cushions.

[–] Hobo 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poor Keanu Reaves gave up his childhood memories in Johnny Mnemonic to store something like 100GB of data in his brain. I don't remember the Star Trek storage callout cause they were generally pretty good about just fabricating their own units for stuff (future sci-fi writers should take note, it's always easier to make up units then deal with pedantic people on the internet).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

they were generally pretty good about just fabricating their own units for stuff

indeed, most of their references to quantities of information use quads; there are a few using bytes though.

[–] sysadmin420 6 points 1 year ago

I lost a 1tb flash drive with ventoy and a bunch of files and I'm still mad, but I had a backup lol

[–] WhoRoger 8 points 1 year ago

The latest SDUC standard allows for up to 128 TB.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

And the price of that 128 gb sd card? €10-15, 512 gb cards are even crazier right now at like €35 a piece, that's €0,068 per gigabyte

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It gets better. The size of the SD card isn't the storage area. Look carefully at the back of an SD card and you should see how a tiny square area in the middle is a bit 'thicker' than the rest; that's the actual chip, that tiny bump!

[–] Bytemeister 3 points 1 year ago

SD cards make sense to me. Hard Drives... Now there is some spooky technology.

The reader head on a hard drive changes direction so fast, that it experiences accelerations like that of a bullet being fired, hundreds of times a second.

The "Fly height" or distance a reader floats above the platter is so tiny, that it would crash into a thumbprint.

The actual magnetic media that stores your data is a layer of iron a few atoms thick deposited on to a ceramic or glass platter, with a single atom layer of a protective metal coating (typically rhodium) in top of it.

Despite these incredible tolerances, they damn things are dirt cheap, and surprisingly reliable.

[–] turmacar 8 points 1 year ago

Also fun, they rely on quantum mechanics.

Individual "bits" on a SD card are electron buckets that are either "full" (they have an electron) or not. 8 bits to a byte ~1 trillion bytes to a terabyte.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I've got a 1tb microsd and it's crazy to see the difference between a 60MB harddisk and it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

That's just another name for the save icon.

[–] CADmonkey 2 points 1 year ago

I really get the feeling that this question isn't being asked seriously but here goes.

Floppy disks are an older removable storage format for a computer. The media inside the disks was flexible like a piece of paper, hence the term "floppy". There were three different common sizes, there was an 8", a 5.25", and a 3.5". The 8" and 5.25" had the flexible media in a sort of heavy fabric and plastic sheath that was itself flexible, amd the 3.5" disks had a hard plastic cover on the outside, with a sliding metal door, and some people erroneously called these "hard disks".