this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
629 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39373 readers
2615 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] electrogamerman 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. It has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.

This is how a dictatorship look like: "Iranian Enginner who protested forced hijab sentenced to 74 lashes"

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was told that it was a ban on all religious symbols and it wasn't a targetted attack on a minority group. Now you are saying it is targeted.

Are we doing the "say the quite part loud" now?

[–] electrogamerman 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When did I say it was targeted?

[–] afraid_of_zombies 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You implied it. "banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. "

[–] electrogamerman 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ban applies to all women that use those clothes, doesn't matter their religion. Happy?

[–] afraid_of_zombies -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] electrogamerman 0 points 1 year ago

Literally same story lmao

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're still not actually supporting that claim. I guess this is what it looks like when you haven't reasoned your way into a position.

By the way, there's a reason democracies tend to value freedom of religion.

[–] electrogamerman 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is anyone banning people from being Muslims? Let me know and I'll go protest for them to the streets.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously, this is the best you came up with? Technically being Muslim isn't banned in China either. Preventing people from harmlessly practicing their religion is also against freedom of religion.

[–] electrogamerman 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?

  2. Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way "harmless"

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?

Hijab is part of Islam so... There's your answer.

Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”

Miss me with your white savior bullshit, Muslim women are perfectly capable of thinking for themselves, so when they ask for hijab to be banned you can say that.

[–] electrogamerman 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

women are perfectly capable of thinking for themselves, so when they ask for hijab to be banned you can say that.

And we come back to the original post. See how this is related now? :)

"White savior bullshit", funny.

[–] solstice 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are SO MANY contrarian assholes on lemmy it's just staggering. You found another one congrats. I'll hypocritically suggest you disengage, although they're fun to poke with sticks.

Personally I'm convinced they are chatbots designed to drive engagement and increase posting. At least I hope so, because the alternative is that all the assholes and morons on this site are real actual people and that's a super depressing thought.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was actually gonna do that after the next reply. I'm mainly hoping someone who's on the fence or who doesn't know much about the topic sees this exchange and change their minds. The people who actually say shit like this out loud are hopeless.

[–] solstice 4 points 1 year ago

change their minds

Good luck with that 🤣 I do this too though so again I acknowledge my hypocrisy.

[–] DarthBueller 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If muslim women are free to think for themselves, why do muslim men beat and murder them so often?

[–] SCB 2 points 1 year ago

Why do all men across the world beat and murder women so often?

Ignorance and poor male leadership in their formative years.