Starfield

2850 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

&lt;spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Lets talk about physics of the speed of spaceship (lemmings.world)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In reality, there is (almost) no force to reduce speed in space.

It was quite unituitive to me in the beginning that when I boost the spaceship, it works lke a car on earth rather than a spaceship. I'd have liked the spaceship to continue to gain speed when either the boost was applied or you continue to throttle the engine. They could have kept a fuel limit to keep the speed in check.

What are your thoughts on this? Would you have liked this to be more based in reality or prefer the familiar car based speed/acceleration that's in the game?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I expect the developers chose this to make sure the casual user is going to enjoy the game first than aiming for accurate physics.

Most people would likely struggle with piloting the spaceship if they'd have to consider proper inertia and momentum.

It would be nice to have the option for it, maybe a mod idea?

[–] seabromd 5 points 1 year ago

Agreed. It feels the same to me as the fighters in Star Wars Squadrons, which is familiar and comfortable.

I can appreciate a goal of realism, but it definitely feels like a hard balancing act with fun. I mean... When I get shot in the game I don't actually die either, haha.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I think that's the basis for that decision as well. They already have simulation in letting us assign powers to different components, this addition would have felt like the real thing to me!

Definitely, someone will make a mod. Alas, I'm on Xbox.

Personally what would you prefer? I'm trying to gauge the sentiment in this community

[–] NOT_RICK 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Xbox supports mods. It won’t support everything, especially mods that require a script extender, so hopefully you’ll be able to benefit from a more accurate space navigation mod at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, I didn't know that. That's going to be fun!

[–] NOT_RICK 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh also mods typically disable achievements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's fine, if they are good :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Personally I prefer the arcade-y feeling for that kind of game.